The Judge Mediator in Contemporary Divorce Cases in Indonesian Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v3i2.10222Keywords:
Conflict Resolution, Divorce Mediation, Indonesian Courts, Judge Mediator, Religious CourtsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of the judge as a mediator in the resolution of divorce cases in Indonesian Religious Courts, focusing on the effectiveness and challenges faced in the mediation process. Using a qualitative approach, the study collects data through in-depth interviews with judges, mediators, and parties involved in divorce cases, as well as an analysis of relevant legal documents. The findings show that judges play a central role in the mediation process, both as neutral facilitators and as active mediators who can influence the final decision. However, the success of mediation largely depends on the mediator's skills, understanding of the existing laws, and the willingness of the parties to cooperate in the mediation process. Additionally, there are challenges related to the limited training of judges in mediation skills and the lack of clarity in some legal aspects governing mediation in Religious Courts. The study concludes that to improve the effectiveness of mediation in divorce cases, it is necessary to enhance judges' capacities through specialized training and to refine regulations that support better mediation practices. The academic contribution of this research is to provide a deeper understanding of the dynamics of the judge’s role as a mediator in family law contexts and to suggest policies that could enhance mediation practices in Indonesian Religious Courts for more peaceful and fair resolutions.
References
Abbasi, M. Z. (2017). Judicial Ijtihad as a Tool for Legal Reform: Extending Women’s Right to Divorce under Islamic Law in Pakistan. Islamic Law and Society, 24(4), 384–411. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00244P04
Abbasi, M. Z. (2022). Development of Women’s Right to No-fault Judicial Divorce (Khul‘) in Pakistan. ISLAMIC STUDIES, 61(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v61i2.2313
Ahmatnijar, A., Tenrilawa, D. F., Asmuni, A., Matsum, H., & Subha, R. (2022). WHEN RELIGIOUS JUDGES PROTECT CHILDREN’S RIGHTS: Case of Divorce in Padangsidempuan Religious Court. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 15(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2022.15204
Andar Yuni, L. (2021). The use of ex officio to fulfill women’s post-divorce rights at the Samarinda Religious Court. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i2.135-154
Azwar, Z., Firdaus, F., & Nafis, M. (2020). The Role of the Malay Customary Institution in Off-Court Divorce Mediation: A Case Study in Rantau Pandan, Jambi. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 20(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.561
Baitar, R., De Mol, J., & Rober, P. (2016). Exploring Helpful Tensions between Divorce Mediators and Clients: A Relational Dialectical Analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 34(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21167
Bala, N., Birnbaum, R., Poitras, K., Saini, M., Cyr, F., & LeClair, S. (2017). Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy. Family Court Review, 55(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12301
Bastaits, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2016). Parenting as Mediator Between Post-divorce Family Structure and Children’s Well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(7), 2178–2188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0395-8
Bourassa, K. J., Tackman, A. M., Mehl, M. R., & Sbarra, D. A. (2019). Psychological Overinvolvement, Emotional Distress, and Daily Affect Following Marital Dissolution. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.184
Brand, J., Moore, R., Song, X., & Xie, Y. (2019). Why Does Parental Divorce Lower Children’s Educational Attainment? A Causal Mediation Analysis. Sociological Science, 6, 264–292. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a11
Brown, H., & Keshavjee, M. M. (2025). Marriage, Divorce and Mediation of Family Disputes in Judaism and Islam. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10109
Brzobohatý, R. (2024). The inclusion of children in divorce mediation: A continental ‘non‐directive’ approach. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 41(4), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21423
Cheng, L.-H., Lin, Y.-H., Lin, S.-H., Hsia, P.-H., & Chen, I.-M. (2025). The COVID-19 pandemic and internet searches for divorce with stay-at-home behavior as a mediator: A multinational longitudinal study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(8), 2212–2230. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251339268
Dahlan, A. rahman, Fathinuddin, F., Azizah, A., Yunus, N. R., Shapiulayevna, A. P., & Ali, Y. (2023). Women’s Post-Divorce Rights in Malaysian and Indonesian’s Court Decisions. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.27967
Darmawan, D., Husna, A., Rahmatillah, M., & Imran, H. (2022). Marriage Dispensation and Family Resilience: A Case Study of the Bener Meriah Shariah Court, Aceh Province. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i2.28827
Donohue, W. A. (2023). Communication, Marital Dispute, and Divorce Mediation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003383123
Donohue, W. A., Sherry, J. L., & Idzik, P. (2016). Interaction Dynamics Predict Successful Negotiation in Divorce Mediation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15603090
Faisal, F., Said, M. H. M., Manfarisyah, M., Jumadiah, J., Herinawati, H., & Effida, D. Q. (2024). DIVORCE SETTLEMENT THROUGH MEDIATION PROCESS IN LHOKSEUMAWE SHARIA COURT. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.153-166
Garcia, A. C. (2021). Locations for advice‐giving and the production of neutrality in divorce mediation sessions. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 38(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21292
Ghauri, N. (2024). Muslim Women’s Experiences of Islamic Evaluative Mediation within Shari’a Councils in England and Wales in relation to Obtaining Divorce as Victims of Domestic Abuse. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 46(4), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2025.2454105
Hariyanto, E. (2022). Public Trust in the Religious Court to Handle Dispute of Sharia Economy. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26216
Hasibuan, R. A., Ansari, A., & Jamil, J. (2024). Considerations of Judges of the Binjai Religious Court in Determining the Status of the Missing Defendant in Divorce Cases in the Perspective of Progressive Legal Theory. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 9(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v9i1.2892
He, X. (2017). ‘No Malicious Incidents.’ Social & Legal Studies, 26(4), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916681068
Junus, N., Sarson, M. T. Z., Elfikri, N. F., & Muntholib, J. W. (2024). Integration of Mediation in Divorce Cases Reviewed from Supreme Court Regulation on Court Mediation Procedures. Jambura Law Review, 6(1), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i1.19370
Kasim, F. M., Nurdin, A., Muthalib, S. A., Syarifuddin, S., & Samad, M. (2022). The Protection of Women and Children Post-Divorce in Sharia Courts in Aceh: A Sociological Perspective. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i2.28747
Kim, J. K., Arpawong, T. E., Klopack, E. T., & Crimmins, E. M. (2024). Parental Divorce in Childhood and the Accelerated Epigenetic Aging for Earlier and Later Cohorts: Role of Mediators of Chronic Depressive Symptoms, Education, Smoking, Obesity, and Own Marital Disruption. Journal of Population Ageing, 17(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-023-09434-5
Law, S. (2021). Upholding parental responsibility by family mediation: revisiting the role of the law for children in divorce in Hong Kong. Public Administration and Policy, 24(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-08-2021-0045
Mandal, S. (2018). Out of Shah Bano’s shadow: Muslim women’s rights and the Supreme Court’s triple talaq verdict. Indian Law Review, 2(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2018.1510162
McGowan, D. (2018). Reframing the mediation debate in Irish all-issues divorce disputes: from mediation vs. litigation to mediation and litigation. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2018.1444445
McIntosh, J. E., & Tan, E. S. (2017). Young Children in Divorce and Separation: Pilot Study of a Mediation‐Based Co‐Parenting Intervention. Family Court Review, 55(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12291
Murdan, M. (2025). A Judge’s Response to the Phenomenon of Indonesian Legal Pluralism. Justicia Islamica, 22(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i1.9818
Nissel, S. M. (2025). Execute Justice and Charity for Your People: Jewish Divorce Mediation as a Model for Intrareligious Peacekeeping. Religions, 16(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16010045
Nofiardi, N., & Samiran, F. (2023). Living Under the Same Roof Before the Date of Separation: The Relevance of Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah and Minangkabaunese Custom in A New Direction for Families. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(2), 305. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.9014
Nyaata, V., Zaal, F. N., & Peté, S. A. (2024). Including Children’s Views in Divorce Mediation: A Comparative Analysis and Recommendations or Kenya. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 27. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a14416
Ordway, A. M., Moore, R. O., Casasnovas, A. F., & Asplund, N. R. (2020). Understanding Vicarious Trauma, Burnout, and Compassion Fatigue in High-Conflict Divorce. The Family Journal, 28(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720904028
Rinaldo, R., Nisa, E. F., & Nurmila, N. (2024). Divorce Narratives and Class Inequalities in Indonesia. Journal of Family Issues, 45(5), 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231155657
Ross, L. F. (2019). Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 30(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1086/JCE2019303183
Salamah, U. (2021). Settlement Of Divorce Dispute Through The Forum Of Mediation In Judicial Institutions As An Effort Of Legal Protection For The Rights And Interests Of The Child Of Post-Divorce. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v21i2.4603
Sebyar, M. H., Jafar, W. A., Harahap, S. M., Putra, D., & Efendi, R. (2025). Divorce Mediation at Panyabungan Religious Court: Transforming the Desire for Divorce into Reconciliation through Cultural Values in Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v19i1.12255
Siregar, N. M., Albani, M. S., & Yazid, I. (2024). The Rights of an Apostate Wife Whom Her Husband Divorces Based on The Judgment of Islamic Religious Judges. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 10(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v10i1.2940
Spaan, J., van Gaalen, R., & Kalmijn, M. (2022). Disentangling the Long-term Effects of Divorce Circumstances on Father–Child Closeness in Adulthood: A Mediation Analysis. European Journal of Population, 38(5), 1183–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09636-1
Swasono, E. P., Djatmika, D., & Sumarlam, S. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Divorce Mediation Within Indonesian Religious Court,. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol 15(No 1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1501.19.
Weaver, J. M., & Schofield, T. J. (2015). Mediation and moderation of divorce effects on children’s behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000043
Yusuf, N., Azizah, N., & Hasan, F. (2023). Feminism Analysis of Judges’ Considerations for Post-Divorce Domestic Violence Victims in Medan and Banda Aceh Religious Courts. Al-’Adalah, 20(2), 283. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v20i2.16177
Zhang, Y., Li, C., Sheng, Y., Ge, J., & Luo, B. (2024). Judicial intelligent assistant system: Extracting events from Chinese divorce cases to detect disputes for the judge. Expert Systems, 41(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13540
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Akmal Marzuqin, Saini Saini, Awaliya Safithri, Wildan Miftahussurur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
