Religious Time and Symbolic Hegemony: An Analysis of National Holiday Policy in Indonesia

Authors

Keywords:

Collective Memory, Religious Time, Symbolic Hegemonization, National Holiday, Indonesia

Abstract

This article examines the national holiday and collective leave policies in Indonesia as a practice of the religious time that reflects the relationship between the state, religion, and the formation of collective memory. Through a thematic content analysis of the Joint Decree of Three Ministers concerning National Holidays and Collective Leave for the 2020–2025 period, the article demonstrates that the regulation of public time is not merely an administrative instrument but also an arena of symbolic hegemonization representing the dominance of the majority religion. The study employs a qualitative approach based on document analysis, specifically Thematic Content Analysis to uncover patterns of representation, symbolic hierarchies, and the state's construction of religious time. Drawing on Maurice Halbwachs’s perspective on collective memory, Murray Edelman’s symbolic politics, and William E. Connolly’s critique of state neutrality regarding religious representation, the study analyzes how the national calendar functions as a temporal artifact that determines which events are institutionalized as shared memory. Research findings indicate that the distribution of national holidays and collective leave days reveals a pattern of religious time dominance, particularly through the greater representation of majority religious celebrations. The article contributes to the study of state-religion relations by expanding the understanding of hegemony as a form of temporal control, specifically, how the state constructs legitimacy and collective identity through the regulation of social time. The study asserts that the national calendar is not merely an administrative list but a political space reflecting processes of inclusion, exclusion, and the negotiation of religious representation within a pluralistic society.

References

@Nclaave, T. (2023). Cuti lebaran bisa seminggu, tapi Waisak, Imlek, Nyepi?.. Twitter; Twitter (X).

Angenot, M. (1988). Pour une théorie du discours social : problématique d’une recherche en cours. Littérature, 70(2), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.3406/litt.1988.2283

Angenot, M. (2004). Social Discourse Analysis: Outlines of a Research Project. The Yale Journal of Criticism, 17(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/yale.2004.0008

Bellah, R. N. (2005). Civil religion in America. Daedalus, 96(1), 40–55.

Bennett, W. L., & Edelman, M. (1985). Toward a New Political Narrative. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02979.x

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Qualitative Research in Psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Budiwanti, E. (2018). Pawai Ogoh-Ogoh Dan Nyepi Di Pulau Seribu Masjid: Penguatan Identitas Agama Di Ruang Publik. Harmoni, 17(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v17i2.319

Connolly, W. E. (1999). Why I am not a Secularist (internet a). University of Minnesota Press.

detik.com / Prasetia, A. (2025). Kesenjangan di Balik Cuti Bersama. Detikcom.

Edelman, M. (1971). Politics As Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Academic Press, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/0010723

Halbwachs, M. (1992a). Maurice halbwachs: from the collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Halbwachs, M. (1992b). On Collective Memory (L. A. Coser (ed.)). The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.52200/53.a.c4gwdaq3

Hendriyani, I. G. A. D. (2024). Eid al-Fitr Holiday has a Big Impact on the Tourism and Creative Economy Players. Economy, Ministry of Tourism and Creative.

Hidayat, A. H. T., & Izomiddin, I. (2019). Kebijakan Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia Tentang Penetapan Satu Ramadhan Dan Satu Syawal Dalam Upaya Penyatuan Umat Islam Di Indonesia. Muamalah, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19109/muamalah.v5i1.4931

Keputusan Bersama 3 Menteri Nomor 1017, 2, Dan 2 Tahun 2024 Tentang Hari Libur Nasional Dan Cuti Bersama Tahun 2025, Pub. L. No. 1017, 2, and 2 (2024).

Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2024 Tentang Hari-Hari Libur, 209701 (2024).

Miles, M. B. … Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (e reader). SAGE Publications.

Narottama, N. (2016). Nyepi Holiday Package: Between Commercialization, Commodification and Revolting to Hegemony. E-Journal of Tourism, March 2016. https://doi.org/10.24922/eot.v3i1.20839

Olick, J. K. (2007). The Politics of Regret: Collective Memory in the Age of Atrocity. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

Peters, F. E. (1994). Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians. University Princeton Press.

Reddit_user_2022. (2022). “Memang seharusnya seperti itu, wong liburnya berdasarkan iman Kristen.

Ridwan, R., & Zain, M. F. (2021). Religious symbol on determining the beginning and end of ramadan in indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6397

Sasikirono, N., & Meidiaswati, H. (2017). Holiday Effect in The Indonesian Stock Market. 131(Icoi), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoi-17.2017.23

Wuthnow, R. (2011). Red State Religion: Faith and Politics in America’s Heartland. Princeton University Press.

Yaqin, ’Alamul, & Khasna, S. (2024). National Holidays and Collective Leave for Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha Within the Framework of Religious Moderation in Indonesia. Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, 5(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v5i1.1000

Zerubavel, E. (1981). Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). University of California Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nasir, M., & Wahyuni, D. (2026). Religious Time and Symbolic Hegemony: An Analysis of National Holiday Policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 10(1), 106–120. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinbukittinggi.ac.id/fuaduna/article/view/11176

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nasir, Dwi Wahyuni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).