The Fink Active Learning Model For Scouting Concept Acquisition And Retention

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v11i1.11496

Keywords:

Fink Model, Active Learning, Scouting Concepts, Concept Acquisition, Physical Education

Abstract

Undergraduate scouting education in Iraq continues to rely predominantly on lecture-based instruction, and graduates frequently fail to retain scouting concepts beyond the examination period; moreover, few if any published experimental studies have examined the Fink Active Learning Model within scouting education or any physical education context. This study therefore investigated the effect of the Fink Active Learning Model on the acquisition and retention of scouting concepts among first-year undergraduate students in the Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Zakho, Iraq (academic year 2024–2025). An experimental Equivalent-Groups Post-Test-Only Design with Controlled Observation was adopted. Thirty-six male first-year students were assigned, by lottery of intact class sections, to an experimental group (n = 18), taught through the Fink Active Learning Model, and a control group (n = 18), taught through the conventional method. Over a ten-week intervention comprising 20 teaching units, both groups studied identical scouting content, and learning was measured with a validated 45-item multiple-choice Scouting Concepts Test administered immediately after the intervention (acquisition) and again two weeks later (retention). Mann–Whitney U tests revealed statistically significant differences favouring the experimental group in both concept acquisition (U = 68.5, z = −2.96, p = .003, r = .49, medium effect) and retention (U = 49.0, z = −3.58, p < .001, r = .60, large effect); the experimental group's descriptive retention rate was also higher (93.52% vs. 88.80%). The findings extend the empirical evidence base of the Fink Model into scouting education and physical education, and support the value of structured, experiential, and dialogic active learning designs for promoting durable conceptual learning in these fields.

References

Ali, H. I. K. (2024). The effect of teaching Arabic grammar according to the Fink model on achievement and attitude toward learning among second-intermediate female students in Iraq. Midad Al-Adab Journal, 16(36), 231–257.

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). MIT Press.

Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass.

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. McGraw-Hill.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Deslauriers, L., & Wieman, C. (2011). Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 7(1), Article 010101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010101

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hidayat, C., Lengkana, A. S., Rohyana, A., Purwanto, D., Razali, & Rosalina, M. (2023). Motivating active learning in physical education: Critical thinking. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1137

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Hussein, M. W. (2013). An evaluative study of scouting camp curricula for advanced scouts from the perspective of scout leaders [Unpublished master’s thesis]. College of Basic Education, University of Diyala.

Jerry, J. F., & Jack, J. (2005). Introduction to research in physical education (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327

Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391

Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006

Murad, S. A., & Suleiman, A. A. (2005). Tests and measures in psychological and educational sciences: Steps for preparation and properties (2nd ed.). Dar Al-Kitab Al-Hadith.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Radi, I. (2020). The effect of an instructional design using the Ashour and Fink models on learning certain basketball skills. Journal of the College of Basic Education, Al-Mustansiriya University, 21, 68–82.

Roediger, H. L., III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003

Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

Salem, H. A. (2026). Effectiveness of a programme integrating the Fink model and graduated activities in developing creative writing skills among Arabic language education students at Al-Azhar University. Journal of the Faculty of Education for Girls in Cairo, Al-Azhar University, 3(9), 395–415.

Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2023). Active learning improves academic achievement and learning retention in K–12 settings: A meta-analysis. Journal on School Educational Technology, 18(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.18.3.19288

Ubaidat, T., Adas, A., & Abdulhaq, K. (2020). Scientific research: Its concept, tools, and methods (19th ed.). Dar Al-Fikr.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Harvard University Press.

World Organization of the Scout Movement. (2020). Scouting: An educational system. WOSM Bureau. https://www.scout.org

Younis, A., & Al-Saffawi, M. (2025). The effect of the Fink model on the achievement of fourth-grade scientific students in Quran and Islamic education. Journal of Education for the Humanities, 5(18.1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.33899/jeh.2025.187026

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Naif Nabi, A., Mohammed Salih Suliman, R., & Mahdi Mohammed, M. (2026). The Fink Active Learning Model For Scouting Concept Acquisition And Retention. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 11(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v11i1.11496

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.