The The Burial Shroud as Dowry: Discrimination Against Women in the Reality of Minangkabau Custom

Discrimination Against Women in the Reality of Minangkabau Custom

Authors

  • Nur Azizah Azizah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) SYAHADA Padangsidimpuan, Indonesia
  • Rahmiati rahmiati Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Shafra Shafra Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Elkhairati Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Yustiloviani yustiloviani Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Mahmud Yunus Batusangkar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisma.v10i1.10435

Abstract

In Nagari Padang Laweh, a dowry in the form of a burial shroud (kain kafan) is determined by customary law. This provision applies to every woman who marries, whether a maiden or a widow. The tradition aims to promote social equality and prevent jealousy among community members. However, from the perspective of Islamic law, women are granted the right to determine their own dowry as a form of respect, appreciation, and protection, as emphasized in Qur’an Surah An-Nisa (4):4. This study aims to analyze the social and legal meanings of the dowry tradition involving a burial shroud in Nagari Padang Laweh, and to examine its compatibility with the principles of dowry (mahr) in Islamic law. The research employs a qualitative approach with normative-descriptive analysis. Data were collected through interviews with customary leaders, religious scholars, and married couples, as well as a review of classical Islamic jurisprudence literature. The findings reveal that although the dowry tradition in the form of a burial shroud is intended to promote social equality, it effectively nullifies women’s rights and neglects their protection, even appearing discriminatory. In Islamic law, the dowry is prescribed as something possessing economic value and utility, symbolizing honor and recognition of a woman, and she is granted the right to determine its form. Therefore, the dowry tradition involving a burial shroud is categorized as an ‘urf fasid (corrupt custom) because it contradicts the objectives of Islamic law  in upholding the rights and dignity of women within marriage. Keywords: dowry; burial shroud; women’s protection; Islamic law; Minangkabau customary law.

References

Referensi

Buku

Al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqh Ala Mazahib Al-Arba’ah. Jilid ke-4. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, 1990.

Al-Nawawi, Imam. Syarah Shahih Muslim. Jakarta: Dar al-Sunnah, 2013.

Al-Qurthubi, Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Abi Bakr. Al-Jami’ Al-Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Al Resalah, 2006.

Katsir, Abu al-Fida’ Ismail bin Umar bin. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-‘Adzim. Beirut: Dar Ibn Hazm, 2000.

Sabiq, Sayid. Fikih Al-Sunnah. Jilid ke-2. Kairo: Maktabah Dar al-Turas, 2005.

Al-Shan’ani. Subul Al-Salam. Juz ke-3. Bandung: Maktabah Dahlan, n.d.

Al-Syaukani. Irsyad Al-Fuhul Ila Tahqiq Al-Haq Min ‘Ilm Al-Ushul. Mesir: Idarah al-Thiba’ah al- Muniriyyah, n.d.

Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Depok: Gema Insani Press, 2011.

Jurnal

Akbar, Syafaat, and Sainun. “The Existence of Dowry in Marriage : Between Symbol of Social Status and Religious Obligation.” Intizar 30, no. 1 (2024): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v30i1.22709.

Avita, Nur, Ahmad Rusyaid Idris, and Frina Oktalita. “Integration of Tradition and Sharia: Dowry and Dui Menre in the Marriage of the Bugis Community in Bone Regency.” El-Mashlahah 12, no. 2 (2022): 124–38. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i2.4712.

Efrinaldi, Jayusman, shafra, Nurfatati. “Urf Review of The Practice of Gold Marriage Mahar in The Community of Tanjung Senag District Bandar Lampung.” Al-Istinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 277–316.

Farisi, Usman Al, Fakhrurazi, Sadari, Nurhadi, and Risdianto. “Negotiation Between Customary Law and Islamic Law: The Practice of Palang Pintu in The Traditional Marriage in The Betawi Muslim Community.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 15, no. 2 (2023): 268–85. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v15i2.21241.

Firman Arifandi. Serial Hadis Nikah 4 : Mahar Sebuah Tanda Cinta Terindah. 1st ed. Jakarta: Rumah Fiqih Publishing, 2018.

Friantoro, Dian, and Akhmad Akbar Susamto. “The Determinants of the Value of Mahr in Muslim Societies: Evidence from the Indonesian Family Life Surveys.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan 22, no. 2 (2021): 323–39. https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v22i2.11918.

Furqan, Muhammad, and Syahrial Syahrial. “Kedudukan ‘Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Mazhab Syāfi’Ī.” Jurnal Al-Nadhair 1, no. 2 (2022): 68–118. https://doi.org/10.61433/alnadhair.v1i2.9.

Hadi, Mukhammad Nur, Indy Mafiiqo Syatta, Eka Safitri, Fahruddin Ali Sabri, and Ahmad Masum. “Wage-Based Dowry Legal Paradigm: Perspectives of Muslim Generation Z in Surabaya.” Al-Ahkam 33, no. 2 (2023): 157–82. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17591.

Halomoan, Putra. “Penetapan Mahar Terhadap Kelangsungan Pernikahan Ditinjau Menurut Hukum Islam.” JURIS 14, no. 2 (2015): 107–19.

Hamid, Asrul, Andry Muda Nst, Raja Ritonga, Zuhdi Hsb, and Ilham Ramadan Siregar. “Pergeseran Makna Mahar Dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Adat Mandailing: Persfektif Hukum Islam Dan Nilai Sosial.” FAMILIA : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 1 (2025): 22–41. https://doi.org/10.24239/familia.v6i1.298.

Harsya, Rabith Madah Khulaili, and Umdah Aulia Rohmah. “Konsep Mahar Pekawinan Dalam Fiqh Kontemporer Analisis Mubadalah.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 2 (2022): 495–504. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.1973.

Harwati, Tuti, Atun Wardatun, and Nunung Susfita. Fiqh An-Nisa’. Mataram Nusa Tenggara Barat: Kencana PrenadaMedia Group, 2019.

Hasiah, Rahmi, Sawaluddin Siregar, and Shafra. “Pemberian Mahar Di Era Digital: Pandangan Ekonomi Dan Persfektif Al-Qur’an.” Al-Fawatih : Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 6, no. 2 (2025): 277–91.

Ismail, Busyro, Nofiardi, Fajrul Wadi, and Hanif Aidihil Alwana. “The Contribution of ’Urf to the Reform of Islamic Inheritage Law In Indonesia.” Al-Risalah Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 22, no. 2 (2022): 165–78. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i2.1243.

Jayusman, Efrinaldi, and Shafra. “Local Wisdom Equality in Marriage of Gold Entrepreneurs in Kasui Pasar Village.” Journal Ilmiah Al-Syiráh 21, no. 1 (2023): 104–19.

Jayusman, Shafra, Miti Yarmunida, Afrizal, and Nurfatati. “Tradisi Mahar Berupa Emas Pada Perkawinan Masyarakat Kecamatan Tanjung Senang Persfektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Muqaranah 8, no. 1 (2024): 1–16.

Kasim, Nur Mohamad. “The Implementation of Modest and Simple Principle to Mahr As a Contribution to The Indonesian Marriage Law.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 50, no. 2 (2023): 540–48.

Khairuddin. “Mahar Dalam Islam: HUkum, Tuntutan, Dan Realitas Sosial.” Journal of Dual Legal Systems 1, no. 2 (2024): 87–102. https://doi.org/10.58824/jdls.v1i2.222.

Khotibi, Diana. “Kritik Al-Qur’an Terhadap Tradisi Mahar : Analisis Penafsiran QS. Al-Nisa’ Ayat 4.” Kaca (Karunia Cahaya Allah) : Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin 13, no. 1 (2023): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.36781/kaca.v13i1.348.

Listani, Refni Handini, Yurike Natasya Ariani, Moh Syamsi Dhuha, Erfina Dwi Rosidah, and Rif’a Izza Sailurroqma. “Hegemonic Masculinity in The Tradition of Women Proposing Marriage.” Humanisma : Journal of Gender Studies 8, no. 2 (2024): 180–95.

Maskur, Ali, Mahsun Mahsun, Mashudi Mashudi, and Khoirotin Nisa. “Enkulturasi Hukum: Pemberian Mahar Hewan Kerbau Dalam Perkawinan.” Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia 9, no. 2 (2022): 145–65. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v9i2.7270.

Miswardi, Gusril Basir, Edi Rosman, Elfiani, and Adlan Sanur Tarihoran. “Gender Dynamics in Minangkabau Customs : Women’s Role in Safeguarding and Preserving High Heirlooms Introduction Minangkabau.” Humanisma : Journal of Gender Studies 8, no. 2 (2024): 165–79. https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisma.v8i2.9158.

MR, M.Husen, Hamdani, and Ratri Candrasari. “Tradisi Dan Status Sosial Dalam Penetapan Mahar Perkawinan Di Gampong Mamplam Aceh Utara.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM) 3, no. 1 (2022): 32–41.

Nofiardi. “The ‘Urf Perspective of Maanta Bareh Pasaran: Reinforcing the Kinship System through a Local Wisdom in Nagari Balingka.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 75–92. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4132.

Nur Hadi, Mukhammad. “Mahar Produktif Dalam Penalaran Ta’lili.” Qolamuna 4, no. 2 (2019): 171–94. https://ejournal.stismu.ac.id/ojs/index.php/qolamuna/article/view/134.

Putri, Darnela. “Konsep ‘Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Islam.” El-Mashlahah 10, no. 2 (2020): 14–25. https://doi.org/10.23971/maslahah.v10i2.1911.

Santoso, Dri, Jafar Wahyu Abdul, Muhamad Nasrudin, Musda Asmara, and Fauzan. “Harmony of Religion and Culture : Fiqh Munakahat Perspective on the Gayo Marriage Custom.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 2 (2022): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i2.199-218.

Setiyowati, Rinda, and Bomin Permata Abadi. “Konsep Mahar Dalam Perspektif Imam Syafi’i Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Isti’dal : Jurnal Studi Hukum 7, no. 1 (2020): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.34001/istidal.v7i1.2110.

Showkat, Arshi. “The Principle and Practice of Mahr in Muslim Marriage.” Feminist Theology 31, no. 2 (2022): 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350221134992.

Shuhufi, Muhammad. “Mahar Dan Problematikanya (Sebuah Telaah Menurut Syari’at Islam).” DIKTUM : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 13, no. 2 (2015): 121–28.

Subhan. “Nalar Kesetaraan Mahar Dalam Perspektif Syariah Islam.” AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 4, no. 1 (2017): 1–16.

Winario, Mohd. “Esensi Dan Standarisasi Mahar Persfektif Maqashid Syariah.” Jurnal Al-Himayah 4, no. 1 (2020): 69–89.

Yenti, Endri, Busyro Busyro, Ismail Ismail, Edi Rosman, and Fajrul Wadi. “A Set of Prayer Outfits as a Mahar? Discrimination Against Women in the ’Urf Reality of the Archipelago’s Fiqh.” Al-Risalah 20, no. 1 (2020): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v20i1.567.

Zaidah, Yusna, Syahrin Ramadhan, and Anwar Hafidzi. “Bitcoin as a Wedding Dowry : A Case of Marriage With a Dowry Currency Is Not Clear.” Al Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 (2023): 83–93. https://doi.org/100.30983/al hurriyah.v8i2.5683.

Zulaifi. “Konsep Mahar Menurut Pemikiran Ulama Empat Mazhab Dan Relevansinya Di Era Kontemporer.” Qawwam: Journal for Gender Mainstreaming 16, no. 2 (2022): 105–20. https://doi.org/10.20414/qawwam.v16i2.5348.

Wawancara

“Angku Datuk Marajo, Wawancara Juni 2024,” n.d.

“Angku Syukri Ulama/Dai, Wawancara Mei 2024,” n.d.

“Wawancara Dengan Beberapa Tokoh Nagari Padang Laweh Mei 2024,” n.d.

“Widya, Warga Nagari Padang Laweh, Wawancara Juni 2024,” n.d.

“Halima, Warga Nagari Padang Laweh, Wawancara Mei 2024,” n.d.

“Datuk Penghulu Mudo, Wawancara Juni 2025,” n.d.

“Datuk Penghulu Mudo Judin, Wawancara Mei 2024,” n.d.

“Dubalang Ninik Mamak Nagari Padang Laweh, Wawancara Mei 2024,” n.d.

“Jamalus Penyuluh KUA Padang Laweh, Wawancara Juni 2024,” n.d.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Azizah, N. A., rahmiati, R., Shafra, S., Elkhairati, & yustiloviani, Y. (2026). The The Burial Shroud as Dowry: Discrimination Against Women in the Reality of Minangkabau Custom : Discrimination Against Women in the Reality of Minangkabau Custom . HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies, 10(1), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.30983/humanisma.v10i1.10435

Citation Check