The Effect of Betawi Culture-Based Contextual Teaching and Learning on Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Terms of Mathematical Disposition

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v6i1.10916

Keywords:

Contextual Teaching and Learning, Betawi culture, Mathematical problem-solving ability, Mathematical disposition

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of implementing Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) integrated with Betawi cultural elements on students’ mathematical problem-solving ability (MPSA), while considering mathematical disposition as a moderating variable. A quantitative quasi-experimental approach employing a posttest-only control group design was used in this research, involving eighth-grade students from a junior high school in East Jakarta. Data were collected through a mathematical disposition questionnaire and an essay-based test on mathematical problem-solving with Betawi cultural contexts. Data analysis was conducted using a two-way ANOVA and an independent samples t-test. The findings indicate that students who experienced CTL integrated with Betawi culture demonstrated higher mathematical problem-solving ability compared to those who received expository instruction. Furthermore, a significant interaction was identified between the instructional approach and mathematical disposition, where meaningful differences in problem-solving ability were observed only among students with high mathematical disposition.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh penerapan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) terintegrasi budaya Betawi terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis (KPMM) siswa, dengan mempertimbangkan disposisi matematis sebagai variabel moderator. Pendekatan kuantitatif eksperimen semu dengan posttest-only control group design digunakan dalam penelitian ini dan melibatkan siswa kelas VIII SMP di Jakarta Timur. Data diambil melalui angket disposisi matematis dan tes uraian pemecahan masalah matematis dengan konteks budaya Betawi. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Two-Way ANOVA dan uji t sampel independen. Hasil studi melaporkan bahwa siswa dengan pembelajaran CTL berbasis budaya Betawi memiliki KPMM lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran ekspositori. Selain itu, ditemukan adanya interaksi yang kuat antara pendekatan pembelajaran dan disposisi matematis, di mana perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah secara nyata hanya terjadi pada siswa dengan disposisi matematis tinggi.

References

[1] S. M. Brookhart, How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2010. [Online]. Available: www.ascd.org/memberbooks

[2] B. Trilling and C. Fadel, 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.

[3] J. P. Martin, Skills for the 21st century: Findings and policy lessons from the OECD Survey of Adult Skills, vol. 166. Paris: Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1787/96e69229-en.

[4] Partnership for 21st Century Skills, Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Ohio Departemant of Education, 2007. Accessed: Apr. 17, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources

[5] N. Foster and M. Piacentini, Innovating Assessments to Measure and Support Complex Skills. Paris: Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/e5f3e341-en.

[6] OECD, “PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.

[7] A. B. Lestari and E. A. Afriansyah, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP di Kampung Cibogo pada Materi SPLDV,” SIGMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 13, pp. 92–02, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.26618/sigma.v13i2.5812.

[8] S. Marlita and A. G. Adirakasiwi, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel,” Jurnal Educatio, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 37–43, 2024, doi: 10.31949/educatio.v10i1.6597.

[9] N. E. Rahmi, “Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Based on Mathematical Resilience in the Pythagorean Theorem,” Journal of Research on Mathematics Instruction (JRMI), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–10, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33578/jrmi.v3i2.65.

[10] R. Adawiyah, Aniswita, Risnawita, and G. H. Medika, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa VII di SMP Negeri 1 Natal melalui Model LAPS-Heuristic,” Jurnal Edu Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2428–2438, 2026.

[11] D. Dao Samo, Darhim, and B. G. Kartasasmita, “Culture-Based Contextual Learning to Increase Problem-Solving Ability of First Year University Student,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2018, doi: 10.22342/jme.9.1.4125.81-94.

[12] N. Kusumasari, S. Wanabuliandari, and D. R. Rahayu, “Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching Learning Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal terhadap Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas V,” ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/anargya

[13] P. Susanti, N. Burhanudin, G. H. Medika, and K. Kunci, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Script Terhadap Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII,” EDUSAINS : Journal of Education and Science, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–21, doi: 10.57255/edusain.v1i1.17.

[14] A. Aprilianti, S. Sripatmi, N. H. Salsabila, and N. Kurniati, “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Disposisi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 24 Mataram Pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022,” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, vol. 7, no. 3b, pp. 1593–1599, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.29303/jipp.v7i3b.820.

[15] M. Hutajulu, T. T. Wijaya, and W. Hidayat, “The Effect of Mathematical Dispotition and Learning Motivation on Problem Solving: An Analysis,” Infinity Journal: Jpurnal of Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 229–238, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p229-238.

[16] Y. Yustiana, T. A. Kusmayadi, and L. Fitriana, “The Effect Mathematics Disposition of Vocational High School Students on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1808, no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012049.

[17] J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell, Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: Washington, D.C: National Academies Press, 2001. doi: 10.17226/9822.

[18] R. Rezita and T. Rahmat, “Hubungan Disposisi Matematis dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika,” Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 79–90, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.30983/lattice.v2i1.5062.

[19] D. Azizah and V. Fadlikah, “Analysis Of Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability In View Of Mathematical Disposition,” Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 153–169, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.31943/mathline.v8i1.298.

[20] I. Fadillah and W. Wahyudin, “Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Viewed from Students’ Mathematical Disposition,” Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 47–62, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v12i1.9943.

[21] A. R. Adhyan, Sutirna, and H. N. Sopiany, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran CTL Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VII SMP,” Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, vol. 5, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v5i6.1749-1760.

[22] S. Mamartohiroh, R. Muhandaz, and R. Revita, “Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMP/MTs,” Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 46–58, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.32939/tarbawi.v16i01.524.

[23] D. P. Sari, L. Arini, and A. Y. Amaliyah, “The Influence of Contextual Teaching and learning (CTL) Model on Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability,” Jurnal Eduscience (JES), vol. 10, no. 2, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.36987/jes.v10i2.4665.

[24] A. J. Bishop, “Mathematics Education in Its Cultural Context,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19, pp. 179–191, 1988, doi: 10.1007/BF00751231.

[25] A. S. Nur and M. Palobo, “Pengaruh Penerapan Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbasis Budaya Lokal Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika,” AKSIOMA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.22487/aksioma.v6i1.136.

[26] J. A. Dahlan and Nurrohmah, “Integrasi Budaya Masyarakat dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Contoh dalam Pembelajaran Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel,” Pelita: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 15–31, Jun. 2018, Accessed: Apr. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/pelita/article/view/25

[27] E. Sulistyawati, “Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Konstekstual Berbasis Budaya Lokal untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” Factor M: Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.30762/factor_m.v1i1.962.

[28] G. Leder and P. Grootenboer, “Affect and Mathematics Education,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2005, doi: 10.1007/BF03217413.

[29] S. Siyoto and M. A. Sodik, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing, 2015.

[30] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

[31] J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed.). New York: New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

[32] K. J. Preacher, R. C. MacCallum, D. D. Rucker, and W. A. Nicewander, “Use of the Extreme Groups Approach: A Critical Reexamination and New Recommendations,” Psychol. Methods, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 178–192, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.2.178.

[33] S. Arikunto, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi), Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2009.

[34] S. Azwar, Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: PUSTAKA PELAJAR, 2013.

[35] E. B. Johnson, Contextual Teaching and Learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks, CA: Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2002.

[36] M. L. Crawford, Teaching Contextually: Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Waco, TX: CCI Publishing, Inc, 2001.

[37] CORD, Teaching Mathematics Contextually: The Cornerstone of Tech Prep. Waco, TX: Waco, TX: CORD Communications, Inc, 1999.

[38] H. Mashudi and F. Azzahro, Contextual Teaching and Learning. Lumajang: Lumajang: LP3DI Press, 2020.

[39] Mazrur, Contextual Teaching and Learning Dan Gaya Belajar, Implikasi Pada Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Fikih. Banten: Banten: CV. Media Edukasi Indonesia, 2021.

[40] Helmiati, Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.aswajapressindo.co.id

[41] I. Kamaruddin et al., Strategi Pembelajaran. Padang: Padang: PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI, 2022. [Online]. Available: www.globaleksekutifteknologi.co.id

[42] R. Sidiq, Najuah, P. S. Lukitoyo, and Sherin, Strategi Belajar Mengajar Sejarah: Menjadi Guru Sukses. Medan: Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis, 2019.

[43] R. Hayati, R. Rahmi, and H. Delyana, “Implementation of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) on Students’ Capability in Mathematical Problem Solving,” Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 122–134, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35316/alifmatika.2022.v4i2.122-134.

[44] A. Putra, M. D. Nasution, and T. H. Harahap, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Contextual Teaching and Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self-Efficacy Siswa SMK Kesehatan Galang Insan Mandiri,” Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 015–026, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.25157/teorema.v9i1.13844.

[45] E. Surya, F. A. Putri, and Mukhtar, “Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence Of High School Students Through Contextual Learning Model,” Journal on Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 85–94, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94.

[46] P. Zuliyanti and H. Pujiastuti, “Model Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP,” Jurnal PRISMA, vol. 9, no. 1, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.35194/jp.v9i1.899.

[47] D. B. McLeod, Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: New York: Macmilian Publishing Company, 1992.

[48] G. A. Goldin, “Affective Pathways and Representation in Mathematical Problem Solving,” Math. Think. Learn., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 209–219, Jul. 2000, doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0203_3.

[49] A. H. Schoenfeld, Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics, In D. Grouws. New York: New York: MacMillan, 1992.

[50] G. Polya, How to Solve It A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.

[51] J. D. Bransford and B. S. Stein, The ideal problem Solver: A Guide for Improving Thinking, Learning, and Creativity (2nd Ed), Second Edition. New York: New York: W.H. Freeman, 1993.

[52] J. B. Wilkerson, “Cultivating a Productive-Disposition Toward Mathematics by Engaging in Service-Learning,” PRIMUS, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 869–882, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2020.1776803.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Siswanto, E., Suyono, & Nur Hajizah, M. (2026). The Effect of Betawi Culture-Based Contextual Teaching and Learning on Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Terms of Mathematical Disposition. Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 6(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v6i1.10916

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Juni 2026

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Eko Siswanto, Suyono, Mimi Nur Hajizah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).