An Analysis on Material Design of The Module Entitled “Bahasa Inggris Kelas 2"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v2i2.5116Keywords:
analysis, material designAbstract
The background of the research was the problems that existed of the module entitled “Bahasa Inggris Kelas 2 SDIT Syahiral 'Ilmiâ€. The English teacher who used the module said that the instructions in the module only use English while students are still in the second grade. Thus, the students find it difficult to understand what to do and there are a lot of subject materials in the module. The purpose of this research is mainly intended to find out whether the module is appropriate or not with the criteria of good material design suggested by Sundara Rajan. The descriptive quantitative research was used in this research. In collecting data, the researcher used rubric and documentation as the instrument. The researcher analyzed the module by taking data with the following steps: Finding out the material, after that identifying the material, classifying the material, coding the data, comparing the material in the module with the criteria of good material design suggested by Rajan, and the last giving a percentage to rate the module. The results showed that the percentage of appropriate on material design for each material in the module includes: Numbers 11-20 is 82% or good, Part of Body is 82% or good, Simple Instructions 1&2 is 91% or good , Thanks and Sorry is 82% or good, Things in The Class is 55% or deficient, Part of School is 64% or fair, Food is 82% or good, Drinks is 82% or good, Part of House is 82% or good, Things in The Diningroom is 82% or good, Things in The Kitchen is 82% or good. The final result shows that the percentage of appropriate on the material design developed in the module is 79%. It means that the module has good criteria on material design as suggested by Rajan.
Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah permasalahan yang ada pada modul yang berjudul “Bahasa Inggris Kelas 2 SDIT Syahiral 'Ilmi†yaitu guru bahasa Inggris yang menggunakan modul mengatakan bahwa petunjuk dalam modul hanya menggunakan bahasa Inggris sementara siswa masih kelas dua sehingga siswa sulit memahami apa yang harus dilakukan dan terdapat banyak materi pelajaran dalam modul. Tujuan dari penelitian ini terutama untuk mengetahui apakah modul tersebut sesuai atau tidak dengan kriteria desain material yang baik yang dikemukakan oleh Sundara Rajan. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Dalam pengumpulan data, peneliti menggunakan rubrik dan dokumentasi sebagai instrumennya. Peneliti menganalisis modul dengan mengambil data dengan langkah-langkah sebagai berikut: Menemukan materi, setelah itu mengidentifikasi materi, mengklasifikasikan materi, coding data, membandingkan materi dalam modul dengan kriteria desain materi yang baik yang disarankan oleh Rajan , dan memberikan persentase untuk menilai modul. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persentase kesesuaian desain materi untuk setiap materi dalam modul meliputi: Angka 11-20 sebesar 82% atau baik, Bagian Badan sebesar 82% atau baik, Petunjuk Sederhana 1&2 sebesar 91% atau baik , Terima kasih dan Maaf adalah 82% atau baik, Hal-hal di Kelas adalah 55% atau kurang, Bagian dari Sekolah adalah 64% atau sedang, Makanan adalah 82% atau baik, Minuman adalah 82 % atau baik, Bagian Rumah 82% atau baik, Barang di Ruang Makan 82% atau baik, Barang di Dapur 82% atau baik. Hasil akhir menunjukkan bahwa persentase kesesuaian desain materi yang dikembangkan dalam modul adalah 79%. Artinya modul tersebut memiliki kriteria desain material yang baik seperti yang disarankan oleh Rajan.
References
Arikunto. 2010. “Suharsimi Arikunto.Pdf.†Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik-Revisi Ke X.
Azizah, Ainul, and Budi Purwoko. 2019. “Studi Kepustakaan Mengenai Landasan Teori Dan Praktik Konseling.†Jurnal Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Surabaya 7 (2): 1–7.
Education Sector. 2005. A Comprehensive strategy for textbooks and learning materials. France: the united nations scientific and cultural education.
Fatmawati, Harma. 2012. “The Compability of English Learning Material in Let’s Learn English (2) Used in Elementary School Based on Rajan’s Criteria,†no. 2.
Harmer, Jeremy. n.d. “The Practice of Nglish Languag Teaching.â€
Prastowo, A. (2014), Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik: Tinjauan Teoritis dan Praktik, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Rajan, Sundara. 2003. Material Design. SEAMO. Regional Language Centre.
Robinett, Betty Wallace, Tom Hutchinson, and Alan Waters. 1987. “English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach.†The Modern Language Journal 72 (1): 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/327576.
S. Nasution. 2009. Asas-asas Kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sudaryono, Gaguk Margono, & Wardani Rahayu. (2013), Pengembangan Instrumen Penelitian Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono. 2015. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung.†Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D), 308.
Tomlinson, Brian. (1998) Materials Development in Language Teaching, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
UNESCO. 2005. “A Comprehensive Strategy for Textbooks and Learning Materials.â€
Walizer, edited by Sadiman. 1991. Metode dan Analisis Penelitian: Mencari Hubungan. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Williams, David. 1983. Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation. ELT Journal Volume 37/3 July.
Yusuf, Muri. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Kencana.
Downloads
Additional Files
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).