Penilaian Analitik, Holistik dan Skala Persepsi pada Pelajaran Aljabar

Authors

  • Elva Susanti Universitas Putera Batam, Indonesia
  • Citra Indah Asmarawati Universitas Putera Batam, Indonesia
  • Anggia Arista Universitas Putera Batam, Indonesia
  • Sadiq Ardo Wibowo Institut Teknologi Batam, Indonesia
  • Arsyad Sumantika Universitas Putera Batam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v3i1.6299

Keywords:

Analitik, Huristik, Skala Persepsi

Abstract

Education is very important for the progress of the country, education cannot be separated from an assessment. Assessment must be based on the existing rubric to be clear, structured, and transparent. One of the existing assessments is based on analytic, holistic, and perceptual scales. The purpose of this study was to establish an assessment rubric in the algebra course because the course was only seen from a quantitative assessment, but in this study, it was assessed based on attitude, and character and then made criteria based on independent assignments and structured assignments and the results would later be tested differently by using the sample t-test. test, namely the independent sample t-test, the results of the data are not normally distributed, it is better to use the Wilxoson test and sign t-test. The result is that there is no difference between independent tasks and structured tasks seen from the significant table and the t-test table. Pendidikan sangatlah penting bagi kemajuan negara, pendidikan tidaklah lepas dari suatu penilaian. Penilaian haruslah berdasarkan rubrik yang ada agar jelas, tertruktur dan transparan. Salah satu penilaian yang ada berdasarkan analitik, holistik dan skala persepsi. Tujuan penelitian ini, menetapkan rubrik penilaian dalam matakuliah aljabar karena matakuliah tersebut hanya dilihat dari penilaian kuantitatif saja, namun dalam penelitian ini dinilai berdasarkan sikap, karakternya juga kemudian membuat kriteria berdasarkan tugas mandiri maupun tugas terstruktur dan hasilnya nanti akan diuji beda dengan menggunakan uji sampel t test yaitu independent sample t test, hasilya data tidak terdistribusi normal sebaiknya menggunakan uji wilxoson dan sign t-test. Hasilnya tidak ada perbedaan antara tugas mandiri maupun tugas terstruktur dilihat dari tabel signifikan maupun tabel t test nya.

References

D. Ilham, “Menggagas Pendidikan Nilai dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional,†Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 109–122, 2019.

I. W. C. Sujana, “FUNGSI DAN TUJUAN PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA,†Adi Widya J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 29, 2019, doi: 10.25078/aw.v4i1.927.

Chairiyah, “Pendidikan Karakter dalam Dunia Pendidikan The Education Character in Education World,†Literasi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 42–51, 2014.

E. Cinda and A. Jacobus, “IMPLEMENTASI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DI SEKOLAHMELALUI KETELADANAN DAN PEMBIASAAN,†Pendidik. dasar Indones., vol. 1, no. September, pp. 25–29, 2016.

N. Triana, “Pendidikan karakter,†Mau’izhah, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.55936/mauizhah.v11i1.58.

B. Trisno et al., “Optimalisasi Belajar Menyenangkan di Hari Bermutu Pembelajaran pada SD IT Baiturrahim Parik Putuih,†J. Pengabdian−, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–85, 2022, doi: 10.24090/sjp.v2i1.6524.

K. Kusaeri, “PENILAIAN SIKAP DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA,†JPM J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 61, 2019, doi: 10.33474/jpm.v5i2.1588.

Z. Am, “TEKNIK PENILAIAN HASIL PEMBELAJARAN,†Rausyan Fikr J. Pemikir. dan Pencerahan, vol. 14, no. 02, 2018, doi: 10.31000/rf.v14i02.901.

Sarah Azhari Pohan, “Penerapan Penilaian Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar,†ELSCHO, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2023.

E. Sutrianti, “Think-Pair-Share Technique and Analytic Rubric Assesment for English Writing Learning,†J. Eval. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2017, doi: 10.21009/jep.081.02.

Mabel Sekar, “Mengenal Heuristic Evaluation dalam UX Design,†purwadhikaconnect, 2019.

N. Oper, E. Utami, and H. Al Fatta, “Analisis User Interface Pada Website UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Menggunakan Metode Evaluasi Heuristik,†Semin. Nas. Inov. Teknol., pp. 93–100, 2017.

I. Mahmudi, “Rubrik Analitik Penilaian Hasil Belajar Praktik Pendidikan Agama Islam,†Fikr. J. Islam. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 32–154, 2018.

L. Boy, “Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Kinerja Berbasis Rubrik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa,†Al-TA’DIB, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 191, 2020, doi: 10.31332/atdbwv12i2.1163.

S. Suwarno and C. Aeni, “PENTINGNYA RUBRIK PENILAIAN DALAM PENGUKURAN KEJUJURAN PESERTA DIDIK,†Edukasi J. Pendidik., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 161, 2021, doi: 10.31571/edukasi.v19i1.2364.

N. T. Carr, “A Comparison of the Effects of Analytic and Holistic Rating Scale Types in the Context of Composition Tests,†Issues Appl. Linguist., vol. 11, no. 2, 2000, doi: 10.5070/l4112005035.

M. Ounis, “A Comparison between Holistic and Analytic Assessment of Speaking,†J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 679, 2017, doi: 10.17507/jltr.0804.06.

S. Suwarno, “PENTINGNYA RUBRIK PENILAIAN DALAM PENILAIAN KETERAMPILAN VOCATIONAL SISWA,†Pros. Semin. Nas. UNS Vocat. Day, vol. 1, no. 0, 2017.

A. Rumbalifar, “PENGARUH MODEL DAN CARA PENILAIAN TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA DENGAN MENGONTROL PENGETAHUAN AWAL MATEMATIKA SISWA,†J. Eval. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 2018, doi: 10.21009/jep.091.06.

S. R. Zahara, “PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PBL (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN PROSES DAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA DI SMA,†Relativ. J. Ris. Inov. Pembelajaran Fis., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 29, 2019, doi: 10.29103/relativitas.v1i1.1195.

Henniwati, Dewita, and Idawati, “Pengaruh Foot Hand Massage Terhadap Nyeri Post Sectio Caesarea di BLUD RSUD Kota Langsa,†Fem. J. Kebidanan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–35, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-21

How to Cite

Susanti, E., Asmarawati, C. I., Arista, A., Wibowo, S. A., & Sumantika, A. (2023). Penilaian Analitik, Holistik dan Skala Persepsi pada Pelajaran Aljabar. Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 3(1), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v3i1.6299

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Juni 2023

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Elva Susanti, Citra Indah Asmarawati, Anggia Arista, Sadiq Ardo Wibowo, Arsyad Sumantika

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).