Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Pendidikan Ayah

Authors

  • Fitri Yana Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi, Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Haida Fitri Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi, Bukittinggi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v1i1.4975

Keywords:

Tingkat pendidikan ayah, hasil belajar matematika, one way anova

Abstract

The background in this study is based on the observations of researchers at SMA Negeri 1 Merangin, based on the data on the educational level of fathers of class XI MIPA students who are very diverse where the percentages for elementary school/equivalent are 7.79%, junior high school/equivalent 12.98%, high school/equivalent 56.49% and the tertiary level 22.72%. However, with the father's education level still elementary/equivalent and junior high/equivalent, this does not make the student's mathematics learning outcomes low either. This study aims to determine the difference in the level of father's education on the students' mathematics learning outcomes carried out at SMA Negeri 1 Merangin. This study is a population study using ex-post facto research methods. The total population in this study amounted to 154 students. Data collection techniques using documentation. Based on the results of the study using the Oneway Anova test, the significance value of students' mathematics learning outcomes was sig = 0.808, at a significance level of = 0.05. Because the value of sig = 0.808 > = 0.05 so H0 is accepted. It can be concluded that there is no difference in students' mathematics learning outcomes based on the father's education level in the elementary, middle and high categories in class XI MIPA at SMA Negeri 1 Merangin. Latar belakang pada penelitian ini didasari oleh hasil observasi peneliti di SMA Negeri 1 Merangin, berdasarkan data tingkat pendidikan ayah  siswa kelas XI MIPA sangat beragam dimana diperoleh pesentase untuk tingkat  SD/sederejat sebesar 7.79%, SMP/sederajat 12.98%, SMA/sederajat 56.49% dan tingkat perguruan tinggi 22.72%. Namun dengan masih adanya tingkat pendidikan ayah SD/sederajat dan SMP/sederajat, hal tersebut tidak menjadikan hasil belajar matematika  siswa tersebut rendah pula. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedan tingkat pendidikan ayah terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa yang dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 1 Merangin. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian populasi yang menggunakan metode penelitian ex-post facto. Jumlah populasi pada penelitian ini berjumlah 154 siswa. Teknik  pengumpulan data menggunakan dokumentasi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menggunakan uji Oneway Anova diperoleh  nilai signifikansi hasil belajar matematika siswa sebesar sig = 0.808, pada taraf signifikansi α = 0.05. Karena nilai sig  = 0.808 >  α = 0.05 sehingga H0 diterima. Hal ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa berdasarkan tingkat pendidikan ayah kategori dasar menengah dan tinggi di kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Merangin.

References

M. Mustari, D. Ph, M. T. Rahman, and D. Ph, Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafika Persada, 2014.

A. Nasrun, “56878-ID-psikologi-belajar,†Al-Fikrah J. Kependidikan Islam IAIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin, p. 177, 2015.

KOMPRI, Belajar, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi, 2017.

Oemar Hamalik, Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.

R. Setya, Dasar-Dasar Kependidikan. Jakarta: Rama Edukasitama, 2013.

S. Junita, A. Rahmi, and H. Fitri, “Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar dan Perhatian Orangtua terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Baso Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019,†JURING (Journal Res. Math. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 088, 2019, doi: 10.24014/juring.v2i1.6879.

V. Saswita, Isnaniah, and R. K. Sari, “Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Giving Question and Getting Answer ( GQGA ) terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika,†Juring (Journal Reasearch Math. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2019.

E. Suherman, Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), 2001.

S. H. Nur, Starategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Matematika, 2017.

Muhibin Syah, Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo, 2011.

A. Rinja, “Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan Orangtua Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Sejarah Siswa Kelas XI SMKN 2 Depok Yogyakarta Tahuan Ajaran 2015-2016,†p. 149, 2017.

Zahara Idris, Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan, 2nd ed. Padang: Angkasa Raya, 1995.

P. Bahasa, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.

Sudjana, Metode Statistik. Bandung: PT. Tarsito, 1992.

Yulingga Nanda dan Wasis Himawanto., Statistika Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deeppublish, 2017.

Syofian Siregar, Statistic Parametric Untuk Penelitian Kuantitatif dilengkai dengan perhitungan manual dan aplikasi SPSS versi 17. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.

Agus Widodo dan Kwardiniya Andawaningtyas, Pengantar Statistik. Malang: UB Press, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-04

How to Cite

Yana, F., & Fitri, H. (2022). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Pendidikan Ayah. Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 1(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30983/lattice.v1i1.4975

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Juni 2021

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Lattice Journal : Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).