Prohibition of Same-Clan Marriage in Minangkabau Custom from a Contemporary Islamic Law Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/jilaw.v1i2.10342Keywords:
Minangkabau, Sasuku Marriage, Islamic Law, Matrilineal System, Legal PluralismAbstract
This study aims to analyze the practice of sasuku marriage within the Minangkabau customary system and its evaluation from the perspective of Islamic law. The research seeks to uncover the underlying social, cultural, and religious dimensions that shape the prohibition of sasuku marriage in Minangkabau society, which adheres to a matrilineal lineage system. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach through library research methods, data were collected from books, academic journals, legal documents, and relevant scholarly works accessed both physically and digitally. The findings indicate that the sasuku marriage prohibition functions as a social mechanism to preserve kinship harmony and prevent moral disorder, aligning with Islamic ethical principles regarding lineage and modesty. The study concludes that this customary norm not only upholds social balance but also reflects a harmonious integration between adat (customary law) and syarak (Islamic law). Conceptually, the research contributes to the discourse on legal pluralism and the coexistence of religion and tradition in Indonesia, highlighting how Islamic principles adapt within local cultural frameworks while maintaining their normative integrity. This study provides valuable insights into the evolving relationship between Islamic jurisprudence, indigenous law, and social transformation in matrilineal societies.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik dan larangan normatif perkawinan sasuku dalam sistem adat Minangkabau dan untuk mengevaluasi larangan ini dari perspektif hukum Islam. Dalam masyarakat Minangkabau, yang menganut sistem garis keturunan matrilineal, perkawinan sasuku—perkawinan antara individu yang berasal dari klan yang sama—secara sosial tidak dianjurkan dan secara normatif dilarang, meskipun manifestasi dan interpretasi praktisnya dapat bervariasi di berbagai komunitas. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi landasan sosial, budaya, dan agama yang mendasari praktik adat dan larangan formal perkawinan sasuku melalui kombinasi analisis normatif dan wawasan berbasis lapangan yang terbatas. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan riset pustaka dengan data lapangan pendukung yang diperoleh dari praktik adat yang terdokumentasi, wacana keagamaan lokal, dan temuan etnografi yang ada tentang masyarakat Minangkabau. Data dikumpulkan dari literatur hukum Islam klasik dan kontemporer, teks adat Minangkabau, peraturan perundang-undangan, jurnal akademik yang ditinjau sejawat, dan sumber-sumber terkait lapangan terpilih yang relevan dengan yurisprudensi Islam, hukum adat, dan studi kekerabatan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa larangan pernikahan sasuku berfungsi sebagai mekanisme sosial budaya untuk menjaga kejelasan garis keturunan, melestarikan keharmonisan sosial, dan mencegah kekacauan moral. Tujuan-tujuan ini sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam mengenai perlindungan garis keturunan (ḥifẓ al-nasl), kesopanan, dan etika sosial, sebagaimana tercermin dalam diskusi fiqh tentang pembatasan pernikahan dan batas kekerabatan. Meskipun potensi ketegangan dapat muncul antara norma adat dan interpretasi hukum Islam, masyarakat Minangkabau menyelesaikannya melalui prinsip integratif adat basandi syarak, syarak basandi Kitabullah, yang memungkinkan terciptanya harmoni yang dinegosiasikan antara kedua sistem tersebut. Secara konseptual, penelitian ini berkontribusi pada wacana tentang pluralisme hukum di Indonesia dengan menggambarkan bagaimana hukum Islam dan hukum adat setempat hidup berdampingan dan berinteraksi dalam kerangka hukum nasional, khususnya dalam masyarakat matrilineal, tanpa merusak landasan normatif masing-masing.
References
Aji, Ahmad Mukri, Mara Sutan Rambe, Nur Rohim Yunus, and Rulia Feriera. “Weakening Tradition: The Shifting in Same-Clan Marriage Prohibition in Mandailing Batak.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 2 (December 30, 2021). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.23729.
Bagi, Milad. “Reasons and Drivers of Early Marriage: Insights from Iranian Context.” Marriage & Family Review 61, no. 3 (April 3, 2025): 308–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2024.2436671.
Bahardur, Iswadi, Andayani Andayani, Sarwiji Suwandi, and Nugraheni Eko Wardani. “Matrilineal Marriage Traditions and Hegemonic Masculinity in Marah Rusli’s Sitti Nurbaya.” Masculinities & Social Change 11, no. 1 (February 21, 2022). https://doi.org/10.17583/mcs.7946.
Bourdeaux, Renee, Kathryn Anderson, Amy Duchsherer, Sarah Drivdahl, and Caleb Netterfield. “Happily Ever After?: What Stories Repeatedly Told to Others Reveal about Marriage and Identity.” Marriage & Family Review 59, no. 7 (October 3, 2023): 460–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2023.2233502.
Buyukkececi, Zafer, and Beyda Çineli. “Adult Sibling Relationships: The Impact of Cohabitation, Marriage, Separation, and Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and Family 86, no. 3 (June 13, 2024): 698–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12949.
D. Gale, and L. S. Shapley. “College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage.” The American Mathematical Monthly 120, no. 5 (2013): 386. https://doi.org/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.120.05.386.
Fan, Suiqiong, and Alissa Koski. “The Health Consequences of Child Marriage: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” BMC Public Health 22, no. 1 (February 14, 2022): 309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12707-x.
Gustiawan, Albi, Muhammad Romli, and Muslihun Muslihun. “Prohibition of Same-Travel Marriages in the Customs of the Kampai Minangkabau Tribe Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Perspective Muhammad Tahir Ibnu ’Asyur.” Dirosatuna: Journal of Islamic Studies 7, no. 2 (December 17, 2024): 111–25. https://doi.org/10.31538/dirosatuna.v7i2.4807.
Husna, Zakiyatul, Zainuddin Zainuddin, and Wardatun Nabilah. “BIAS GENDER DALAM PERKAWINAN ADAT: STUDI TENTANG KAWIN SASUKU DI KANAGARIAN SIMARASOK KECAMATAN BASO KABUPATEN AGAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM.” JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah 4, no. 3 (December 31, 2023): 327. https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v4i3.11657.
Irawati, Diah. “UNSUR BUDAYA MINANGKABAU DALAM NOVEL MENCARI CINTA YANG HILANG KARYA ABDULKARIM KHIARATULLAH.” Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 1, no. 2 (December 20, 2015): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v1i2.3180.
Jafar, Wahyu Abdul, Musda Asmara, Mu’adil Faizin, Helena Octavianne, and Budi Kisworo. “Philosophical Foundations and Human Rights in the Bajapuik Tradition: Bridging Local Wisdom and Islamic Law in Minangkabau Marriage Practices.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 16, no. 1 (June 30, 2024): 212–33. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v16i1.27681.
James, Anthony G., Chiquita M. Hughes, Tiffany L. Brown, Roudi Nazarinia Roy, Yolanda T. Mitchell, Lauren Spencer, Wenting Sun, and Angel Wu. “A Warm Welcome and Exciting Horizons for Marriage & Family Review.” Marriage & Family Review 60, no. 1 (January 2, 2024): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2024.2313847.
Junidar Sartika, and Asfar Hamidi Siregar. “Genealogi Larangan Sasuku: Menelusuri Akar Fikih Dan Filosofi Adat Dalam Perkawinan Minangkabau.” Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan 3, no. 1 (May 31, 2025): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.70292/jpcp.v3i1.138.
Letiecq, Bethany L. “Theorizing White Heteropatriarchal Supremacy, Marriage Fundamentalism, and the Mechanisms That Maintain Family Inequality.” Journal of Marriage and Family 86, no. 5 (October 4, 2024): 1184–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12971.
Mardhiyah, Elfadhilatul. “The Prohibition of Marriage with the Former Spouse of a Fellow Martial Arts Member: A Case Study of the Silek Tuo Tradition in Kenagarian Paninggahan, Junjung Sirih, Solok.” Jurnal AL-AHKAM 15, no. 2 (October 13, 2025): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.15548/alahkam.v15i2.9653.
McErlean, Kimberly. “Cohabiting Couple’s Economic Organization and Marriage Patterns across Social Classes.” Journal of Marriage and Family 86, no. 3 (June 27, 2024): 762–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12947.
Muslim Muslim, and Muhamad Fajri. “Komunikasi Persuasif Dan Koersif Niniak Mamak Kepada Anak Kemenakan Yang Kawin Sasuku.” SABER : Jurnal Teknik Informatika, Sains Dan Ilmu Komunikasi 1, no. 4 (October 20, 2023): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.59841/saber.v1i4.536.
Siregar, Ramadhan Syahmedi, Muhammad Syakban, and Muhammad Ikhlas bin Rosele. “The Role of Marriage Guardian of the Same Clan in the Traditional Marriage of Batak Toba Muslims in Samosir Regency in the Perspective of Islamic Law.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 17, no. 1 (April 13, 2023): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i1.6750.
Solihan, Solihan, Izomiddin Izomiddin, Mohammad Syawaludin, Kiki Mikail, and Padila Padila. “Legal Syncretism in Practice: Acculturation of Islamic and Customary Norms in the Tunggu Tubang Marriage Tradition of Semende.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 25, no. 1 (June 2, 2025): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.25060.
Solin, Siti Dian Natasya, Mursyid Djawas, Aulil Amri, Andi Sugirman, and Asni Zubair. “Batak Customary Marriage: A Study of the Prohibition of Same-Clan Marriage and Its Relevance in the Contemporary Era.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 7, no. 1 (June 30, 2024): 62. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.23309.
Suhendi, Andang. “Minangkabau’s Marriage and Delik Adat Laws in Abdulkarim Khiratullah’s Mencari Cinta Yang Hilang.” KnE Social Sciences 3, no. 4 (April 19, 2018): 708. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1979.
Tang, Meng, Yang Shen, and Cheng Cheng. “Intra-Clan Marriage in Modern Times: The Role of Elite Education in Assortative Mating.” Chinese Sociological Review 56, no. 4 (August 7, 2024): 375–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2023.2299786.
Taufika, Ryan, Aulia Rahma Ritonga, Arianto, and Noviawan Rasyid Ohorella. “Consistency of Dalihan Na Tolu vs. Same-Clan Marriage: The Intersection of Customary Law and Islamic Theological Doctrine.” Pharos Journal of Theology, no. 106.2 (March 2025). https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.208.
Villacampa, Carolina. “Approaching Forced Marriage as Family Violence: Good Practices from a South-Western European Region.” Marriage & Family Review 61, no. 3 (April 3, 2025): 251–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2024.2427145.
Yang, Chih‐lan Winnie. “Marriage, Cohabitation, and Institutional Context: Household Specialization among Same‐sex and Different‐sex Couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family 87, no. 1 (February 14, 2025): 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadilla Syahriani, Nadyya Zahratul Jannah.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

