Tracing Secularism: Religion, Power, and Violence in Western and Eastern (Islamic) World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v9i1.9401Keywords:
Religion and Violence, Secularism, Power, Western World, Islamic WorldAbstract
This study examines the complex relationship between religion, violence, and secularism by analyzing the perspectives of thinkers such as Marx, Nietzsche, Hobbes, and Karen Armstrong. Although religion is often considered the primary source of violence, this paper argues that violence related to religion is better understood as a manifestation of deeper political, economic, and existential forces. This study also explores the different paths of secularism development in the Western and Islamic worlds. In the West, secularism emerged as a revolutionary response to the corruption of church authority during the Dark Ages. On the other hand, secularism in the Islamic context was shaped by the need to manage religious diversity, as illustrated by the Medina Charter. The method used in this research is a qualitative-historical analysis of texts discussing the relationship between religion, violence, and the state. The novelty of this research lies in the application of José Casanova's concept of secularism to reveal that, despite the process of secularization, the West has experienced a resurgence of religion in the public sphere—thus demonstrating the failure of secularism as an ideology and nor statecraft principles.
References
Al-Atawneh, M. (2009). Is Saudi Arabia a Theocracy? Religion and Governance in Contemprary Saudi Arabia. Middle Eastern Studies, 45(5).
Al-Attas, M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Amstrong, K. (2016). Fields of Blood: Mengurai Sejarah Hubungan Agama dan Kekerasan. Mizan.
Asad, T. (2007, November 17). Secularism, hegemony, and fullness. SSRC The Immanent Frame. https://tif.ssrc.org/2007/11/17/secularism-hegemony-and-fullness/
Bhargava, R. (2006). Political Secularism. In J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Bonelli, R., Dew, R. E., Koenig, H. G., Rosmarin, D. H., & Vasegh, S. (2012). Religious and spiritual factors in depression: Review and integration of the research. Depression Research and Treatment, 2012, 962860. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/962860
Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking Secularization. The Hedgehoc Review, 8.
Casanova, J. (2009). The Secular and Secularisms. Social Research, 76(4), 1049–1066.
Cavanaugh, W. T. (2009). The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford University Press.
Chistyakova, O. (2024). Religion Against Violence: Insights of Contemporary Philosophy and Eastern Patristics. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111360
Coady, A. J. (2006). Violence and Religion. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 235(1).
Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion. Bantam Press.
Esposito, J. (2015). Islam and Political Violence. Religion, 6, 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/REL6031067
Gabriel, R. A. (2007). Muhammad: Islam’s first great general. University of Oklahoma Press.
Hall, J. R. (2003). Religion and Violence from a Sociological Perspective. In Handbook of the Sociology of Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Hitchens, C. (2007). God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. Allen & Unwin.
Hobbes, T. (2022). Hobbes’s Leviathan: Reprinted From the Edition of 1651 (W. G. P. Smith, Ed.). Legare Street Press.
Kessler, S. (1985). John Locke’s Legacy of Religious Freedom. Polity (Palgrave Macmillian Journals, 17(3).
Locke, J. (1853). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. William Tegg & Company.
Locke, J. (1963). A Letter Concerning Toleration (M. Montuori, Trans.). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8794-7
Marx, K. (1970). Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (J. O’Malley, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Mbeo, N. P. (2020). Analisa Charles Taylor tentang Sekularisasi dan apa yang dapat dipelajari Indonesia daripadanya. Driyakarya School of Philosophy.
Meyer, W. J. (1995). Private Faith or Public Religion? An Assessment of Habermas’s Changing View of Religion. The Journal of Religion, 75(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1086/489624
Moazami, B. (2013). The Invention of a Modern Theocracy: An Unfinished Revolution. In B. Moazami (Ed.), State, Religion, and Revolution in Iran, 1796 to the Present (pp. 135–154). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137325860_8
Newheiser, D. (2018). Derrida and the Danger of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 1(86), 42–61.
Nietzsche, F. (2004). Nietzsche: The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs (B. Williams, Ed.; J. Nauckhoff & A. D. Caro, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Njarakkulath, S. (2015). Islamic Movements Engaging with Democracy: Front Islamique Du Salut (FIS) and the Democratic Experiment in Algeria. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 71(3), 255–271.
Oakley, F. (1988). The Medieval Experience. University of Toronto Press.
Oda, Y. (1986). Muhammad as the Judge: An Examination of the Spesific Quality of Muhammad’s Charismatic Authority. Orient, 22.
Papke, D. R. (2015, January 20). Karl Marx about Religion. Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog. https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2015/01/karl-marx-on-religion/comment-page- 1/#comments
Raji, al F. I. (1982). Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Ramadan, T. (with Internet Archive). (2009). Radical reform: Islamic ethics and liberation. Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press. http://archive.org/details/radicalreformisl0000rama
Taylor Charles. (2007). A Secular Age. Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.
Waters, T. (2018). Book Review of Rodney Stark’s “The Triumph of Religion.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society.
Watt, W. M. (William M. (with Internet Archive). (1996). Islam: A short history. Oxford : Oneworld. http://archive.org/details/islamshorthistor0000watt
Yildirim, :10.1080/09596410903194894. (2009). The Medina Charter: A Historical Case of Conflict Resolution. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 20(4), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410903194894
Zulkarnain, Z. (2011). Konsep Al-Imamah Dalam Perspektif Syi’ah. Journal Tapis: Journal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 7(2), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v7i2.1535
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Rizkita, Abdy Nur Muhammad, Alniatul Fadilah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
