PERBANDINGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DENGAN FATWA NOMOR 68/DSN-MUI/III/2008 TENTANG RAHN TASJILY

Authors

  • Witra Yosi IAIN Bukittinggi
  • Aidil Alfin IAIN Bukittinggi
  • Basri Na'ali IAIN Bukittinggi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v2i2.2071

Abstract

This article discusses the substance of fiduciary guarantees according to Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning fiduciary guarantees with the substance rahn tasjily according to fatwa Number 68 / DSN-MUI / III / 2008. In addition, it is also to find out the legal comparison between fiduciary guarantees according to Law Number 42 Year 1999 and rahn tasjily according to fatwa Number 68 / DSN-MUI / III / 2008. The method used in this research is descriptive comparative analysis. Namely by comparing the substance of fiduciary guarantees according to Law Number 42 of 1999 with rahn tasjily according to DSN Fatwa Number 68 of 2008 as well as the similarities and differences between the two. The conclusion of this research is that the substance of the fiduciary guarantee according to Law No. 42 of 1999 is an agreement in which the debtor binds his agreement to the creditor for the accounts receivable debt which makes proof of ownership of an object to be used as collateral accompanied by an interest. While the substance of rahn tasjily according to fatwa Number 68 / DSN-MUI / III / 2008, namely the rahin binding agreement to the murtahin by using the qardh agreement (accounts receivable debt) accompanied by a collateral / collateral in which the collateral remains in control (utilization) rahin and proof of ownership submitted to the murtahin and ijarah rates in exchange for the cost of maintaining proof of ownership of the collateral. The legal comparison between fiduciary guarantees according to Law Number 42 of 1999 and rahn tasjily according to fatwa Number 68 / DSN-MUI / III / 2008 has similarities in the status of the collateral, the form of the agreement, subject, termination or deletion of the agreement and the method of execution of the object be a collateral object. While the difference lies in the maintenance of objects that are used as collateral for debt, in terms of binding guarantees, in terms of cancellation or transfer of rights by one party, in terms of the transfer of ownership rights and in terms of the mechanism of practice.

References

“AKIBAT HUKUM PENDAFTARAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM SISTEM ONLINE | Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan.†Accessed August 23, 2019. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ActaComitas/article/view/35014.

“AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP EKSEKUSI LELANG DENGAN TANPA ADANYA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Semarang) | Luthfi | LAW REFORM.†Accessed August 23, 2019. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lawreform/article/view/15872.

“ANALISIS FATWA DEWAN SYARIAH NASIONAL NOMOR: 92/DSN-MUI/IV/2014 TENTANG PEMBIAYAAN YANG DISERTAI RAHN | Ihtiar | An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah.†Accessed August 23, 2019. http://ejournal.iain-tulungagung.ac.id/index.php/nisbah/article/view/274.

“ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PEMBIAYAAN RAHN TASJILY TERHADAP KESESUAIANNYA DENGAN FATWA DSN-MUI NOMOR 68/DSN-MUI/III/2008 (Studi Kasus Pada KSPPS BMT Mandiri Sejahtera Jawa Timur Cabang Balongpanggang) | J-MACC : Journal of Management and Accounting.†Accessed August 23, 2019. http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/J-MACC/article/view/752.

“IMPLEMENTASI JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM PEMBERIAN KREDIT DI INDONESIA | PAPARANG | JURNAL LPPM BIDANG EKOSOSBUDKUM.†Accessed August 23, 2019. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lppmekososbudkum/article/view/7220.

“KEDUDUKAN GADAI SYARIAH (RAHN) DALAM SISTEM HUKUM JAMINAN INDONESIA | Setyo | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum.†Accessed August 23, 2019. http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/133.

“PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT DENGAN JAMINAN SURAT KEPUTUSAN PENGANGKATAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL DI PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO) CABANG SALATIGA - Diponegoro University | Institutional Repository (UNDIP-IR).†Accessed August 23, 2019. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/17439/.

“SINKRONISASI FATWA DSN-MUI NO: 68/DSN-MUI/III/2008 TENTANG RAHN TASJILY TERHADAP PASAL 5, PASAL 7, DAN PASAL 11 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA | Andisetya | Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum.†Accessed August 23, 2019. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/715.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-24

How to Cite

Yosi, W., Alfin, A., & Na’ali, B. (2019). PERBANDINGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA DENGAN FATWA NOMOR 68/DSN-MUI/III/2008 TENTANG RAHN TASJILY. Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 2(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v2i2.2071

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): Juli-Desember 2018

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).