Evaluasi Program Pesantren Ramah Anak Model CIPP di Provinsi Sumatera Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/surau.v1i1.6375Abstract
Abstract
This study describes the results of the evaluation of the child-friendly pesantren programme in West Sumatra Province. The model used is CIPP with Mixed Method. Data collection techniques used questionnaires, observation sheets, interviews, concept mastery tests and child-friendly pesantren guidelines. Data analysis and programme evaluation procedures are described in this article. The results of the context evaluation showed that violence, discrimination and harassment still occur in most Islamic boarding schools in West Sumatra province. The results of the input evaluation showed that the child-friendly pesantren program guidelines issued by the Ministry of Religious Affairs, the Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection of the Republic of Indonesia have not been optimally socialised and the pesantren leaders, board of asatidz, santri and the community are aware of the child-friendly pesantren program but do not understand the concept, guidelines and technical instructions for child-friendly pesantren. The results of the process evaluation, namely monitoring designed to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the child-friendly pesantren programme, have not been optimal. Not all pesantren have a child-friendly pesantren development team. For pesantren that already have a child-friendly pesantren team, the team members do not have relevant competencies. The evaluation of products or outputs and outcomes designed to assess programme outcomes and programme sustainability shows that the child-friendly pesantren programme launched and developed by the government and Islamic boarding schools has not run as expected.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menjelaskan tentang hasil evaluasiprogram pesantren ramah anak di Provinsi Sumatera Barat.Model yang digunakanCIPP dengan metode Mixed Method. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan angket, lembar observasi, wawancara, tespenguasaan konsep dan pedoman pesantren ramah anak. Analisis data dan prosedur evaluasi program dijelaskan dalam artikel ini. Sampel penelitian adalah 23 pondok pesantren yang tersebar di 12 kabupaten kota di Provinsi Sumatera Barat.Hasil evaluasi konteks menunjukkan bahwa masih terjadi kekerasan, diskriminasi dan pelecehan di rata rata pondok pesantren di provinsi Sumatera Barat. Hasil evaluasi input menunjukkan bahwa pedoman program pesantren ramah anak yang diterbitkan oleh Kementerian Agama, Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia belum optimal disosialisasikan dan pimpinan pesantren,dewan asatidz,santri dan masyarakat mengetahui adanya program pesantren ramah anak tetapi belum memahami konsep, panduan dan petunjuk teknis pesantren ramah anak. Hasil evaluasi proses, yaitu monitoring yang dirancang untuk mengungkap kekuatan dan kelemahan pelaksanaan program pesantren ramah anak belum optimal. Belum semua pondok pesantren memiliki tim pengembang pesantren ramah anak. Bagi pesantren yang telah memiliki tim pesantren ramah anak, anggota tim belum memiliki kompetensi yang relevan. Evaluasi produk atau keluaran dan hasil yang dirancang untuk menilai hasil programdan keberlanjutan program menunjukkan bahwa program pesantren ramah anak yang diluncurkan dan dikembangan oleh pemerintah dan pondok pesantren belum berjalan seperti yang diharapkan.References
Albert, Z. (2022). Strategi pengikatan Kualitas Pendidikan Pesantren Melalui program Pesantren Ramah Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(11), 966–983.
Alam, N. A. R. (2018). Strengthening leadership culture (the role of kyai in Indonesian pesantren). At-Ta'dib, 13(1), 1-17.
Arsa, D. (2019). Islamic Colleges in Central Sumatra in The 1930s-1950s: The Beginning Efforts of Bringing between The Islamic Science and The Western Science at Local Level. Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, 5(2), 160-172
Beleli, O., Chang, V., Feigelson, M. J., Kopel-Bailey, J. A., Maak, S. A., Mnookin, J. P., ... & Tafoya, S. N. (2007). Education in Emergencies and Early Reconstruction: UNICEF Interventions in Colombia, Liberia, and Southern Sudan. Online Submission.
Creswell, JW and Clark, P.V. (2007). “Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Researchâ€. London : sage publication
Chabbott, C. (2004). UNICEF's Child-friendly Schools Framework: a desk review. New York: UNICEF.
Daulay, H. P., & Tobroni, T. (2017). Islamic education in Indonesia: A historical analysis of development and dynamics. British Journal of Education, 5(13), 109-126.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Worthen, B. R., dan Sander, J. R. (2012). “Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Partical Guidlinesâ€. New Jersey: Pearson
Guanabara, E., Ltda, K., Guanabara, E., & Ltda, K. 2006. M. U. P. S. (n.d.). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 1–110.
Hidayat, M.,Widodo, R dan Thawil, F. 2021. Pedoman Pesantren Ramah Anak. Direktorat Pendidikan DIniyah dan Pondok Pesantren, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam. Kementrian Agama Republik Indonesia. Jakarta
Hrivnak, G. A. (2019). The increasing importance of curriculum design and its implications for management educators. Journal of Management Education, 43(3), 271-280.
Iswantir. (2017). Gagasan dan Pemikiran Serta Praksis Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia (Studi Pemikiran dan Praksis Pendidikan Islam Menurut Azyumardi Azra). Edukative, 2(2).
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta’dib, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551
Mujahid, I. (2021). Islamic orthodoxy-based character education: creating moderate Muslim in a modern pesantren in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 11(2), 185-212.
Rafikah, R. (2017). Peranan pusat pelayanan terpadu pemberdayaan perempuan dan anak (P2TP2A) dalam menghapuskan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) di kota Bukittinggi. Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, 1(2), 173-186.
Rizkiyanti, C. A., & Murty, A. I. (2019). Empathy in early childhood: A preliminary study. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 2(2), 138-145.
Sayekti, I. C., Sari, N. W., Sasarilia, M. N., & Primasti, N. A. M. (2018). Muatan Pendidikan Ramah Anak Dalam Konsep Sekolah Alam. Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.23917/ppd.v1i1.6517
Srimulyani, E. (2007). Muslim Women and Education in Indonesia: The pondok pesantren experience. Asia Pacific journal of education, 27(1), 85-99.
Situmorang, J. R. A., & Susanti, V. (2021). The Role of Victim’s Assistant to Prevent Secondary Victimization: Case Women Victim of Marital Rape. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 5(2), 106-118.
Tusriyanto, T., Anggaira, A. S., Lisdiana, A., Purwasih, A., Karsiwan, K., Wahidah, N. I., ... & Iskandar, I. (2022). The implementation of child-friendly school to fulfill children’s rights and prevent violence against children. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2465-2478.
Zulmuqim, Z. (2017). The Existence of Pesantren, Kiai and Kitab Kuning learning as the Main Element of Islamic Education in Indonesia. Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v1i2.9
