An Analysis of Initiation Response Feedback (IRF) Pattern in Classroom Discourse at Half Nelson Movie

Authors

  • Rifika Chandra STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Padang
  • Yulmiati Yulmiati STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Padang
  • Edwar Kemal STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i2.4835

Abstract

Abstrak

Latar belakang penelitian berdasarkan observasi peneliti dalam film Half Nelson yang menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pola IRF yang digunakan selama interaksi antara guru dan siswa di dalam kelas. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pola IRF terjadi di dalam kelas, bagaimana guru berinisiatif, bagaimana respon siswa, dan bagaimana umpan baliknya. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis wacana dalam linguistik terapan dan menggunakan metode deskriptif. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah interaksi yang terjadi ketika guru dan siswa saling berinteraksi dalam naskah film Half Nelson. Penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling sebagai teknik pengumpulan data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada enam jenis inisiasi yang digunakan, yaitu teacher elicit, teacher direct, teacher inform, teacher listing, re-inisiation (i), re-initiation (ii). Respon tersebut adalah respon siswa spesifik, silent, silent-av, bingung berorientasi kerja, tertawa, respon siswa open-ended, dan nonverbal. Jenis-jenis umpan balik adalah mengulang, mengakui jawaban yang benar, memperluas atau memodifikasi, menunjukkan jawaban yang salah, meringkas, memuji. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa guru menggunakan berbagai jenis inisiasi dalam situasi yang berbeda.

Kata Kunci: Pola IRF, Film Half Nelson, Interaksi

Abstract

The background of the research based on the researcher observation in Half Nelson movie which indicated that there was an IRF pattern used during interactions between teachers and students in the classroom. The purpose of this study is to find out how the IRF pattern occurs in the classroom, how the teacher initiates, how students respond, and how the feedback. This research was conducted using qualitative research by using a discourse analysis approach in applied linguistics and using descriptive methods. The data in this study is the interaction that occurs when teachers and students interact with each other in the Half Nelson movie script. This study uses purposive sampling as a technique in data collection. The results of this study indicate that there are six types of initiation used, namely teacher elicit, teacher direct, teacher inform, teacher listing, re-initiation (i), re-initiation (ii). The responses are students’ response specific, silent, silent-av, confused work-oriented, laughter, students’ response open-ended, and nonverbal. The types of feedback are repeating, acknowledging a correct answer, expanding or modifying, indicating an incorrect answer, summarizing, praising. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the teacher used various types of initiation in different situation.

Keywords: IRF Pattern, Half Nelson Movie, Interaction

 

References

Amin, A. R. (2015). Patterns of Teacher Students Interaction A Case Study of Classroom Interaction in Eleventh Grade of Senior High School in Cimahi. Journal of English and Education 2015, 3(1), 14-29, 3(1), 14–29.

Azizifard, F., & Jalali, S. (2012). Context and humor in teaching language functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.6.1191-1198

Behnam, B., & Pouriran, Y. (2009b). Classroom discourse: Analyzing teacher/learner interactions in Iranian EFL task-based classrooms. Porta Linguarum, 12, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.31875

Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (p. 249): London. Longman

Christie, F. (2002). Classroom Discourse Analysis : A Functional Perspective: London. Continuum

Dagarin, M. (2004). Classroom Interaction and Communication Strategies in Learning English as a Foreign Language. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 1(1–2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.1.1-2.127-139

Ginting, S. A. (2017). The Importance of Opening Moves in Classroom Interaction. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(6), 7–11. http://ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1165038&site=ehost-live

Markee, N. (2015). The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction: Oxford. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (2018). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Rescource: Sydney. Bloomsbury Academic.

Ramli, M. (2020). Classroom Discourse: Teacher Students Interaction and Gender Participation in Primary Science Education. Journal Harkat : Media Komunikasi Gender, 16 (1), 2020, 1-10, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.orh/10.15408/harkat.v16i1.14642

Rezaie, M. (2015). Reviewing Different Aspects of Classroom Discourse. International Journal of English and Education, 4(4).

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. In Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667169

Rustandi & Mubarok. (2017). Analysis of IRF (initiantion-response-feedback) on classroon interaction. Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 2, 239–250.

Suherdi, D. (2010). Classroom Discourse Analysis “A Systemiotic Approach.†: Bandung UPI Press.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-09-29

Accepted

2022-01-31

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): December 2021

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).