Miniature of the Pancasila Family: An Analysis of Interfaith Marriage Practices among the Tengger People and Their Implications for Indonesian Family Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/islamtransformatif.v9i2.9956Keywords:
Interfaith Marriage, Tengger Society, Family Law, Legal Pluralism, Pancasila FamilyAbstract
Abstract
Interfaith marriage in Indonesia remains a deeply contested issue within legal and religious perspectives, particularly following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 1974 and the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 2 of 2023, both of which reinforce prohibitive norms and impose stricter administrative procedures. In contrast to these state-centered regulations, the Tengger indigenous community on the slopes of Mount Bromo treats interfaith marriage as a legitimate tradition aimed at sustaining social harmony. While existing studies have predominantly focused on normative legal debates and theological controversies, limited attention has been paid to local cultural practices that offer alternative, lived models of coexistence. This gap is crucial because indigenous experiences provide socio-legal insights that are often overlooked in state-centered analyses. Addressing this gap, this article explores how interfaith marriage is understood and practiced within Tengger customary law, examines its implications for Indonesia’s national family law framework, and analyzes the idea of the “miniature Pancasila family” as an expression of legal pluralism at the community level. Drawing on qualitative socio-legal research conducted in Ngadas, Wonokerto, and Ngadisari, the findings show that communal harmony is preserved through the waralaga custom and the philosophical principle of rukun, alongside pragmatic administrative strategies, such as “temporary conversion”, employed to meet state requirements. These insights suggest that Indonesia’s family law could benefit from more contextual and pluralistic approaches that resonate more closely with Pancasila’s foundational values.
Abstrak
Artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa fenomena perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia terus memicu perdebatan hukum dan keagamaan, terutama sejak berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 serta Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 yang menegaskan larangan dan pengetatan administrasi. Berbeda dengan itu, komunitas adat Tengger di lereng Gunung Bromo justru memandang perkawinan beda agama sebagai tradisi yang sah dan dapat menjaga kerukunan sosial. Kajian sebelumnya masih berfokus pada perdebatan normatif-teologis, sehingga kurang memberi perhatian pada praktik budaya lokal yang menawarkan model koeksistensi alternatif. Kekurangan ini penting karena pengalaman hidup komunitas adat memberikan dinamika sosiolegal yang jarang terungkap dalam analisis yang berpusat pada negara. Artikel ini mengkaji bagaimana perkawinan beda agama dipahami dan dijalankan dalam adat Tengger, implikasinya terhadap hukum keluarga nasional, serta bagaimana konsep “keluarga miniatur Pancasila” mencerminkan pluralisme hukum pada tingkat komunitas. Berdasarkan penelitian kualitatif sosio-legal di Ngadas, Wonokerto, dan Ngadisari, temuan menunjukkan bahwa harmoni dipelihara melalui adat waralaga dan filosofi rukun, sementara strategi administratif seperti “konversi sementara” digunakan untuk memenuhi syarat negara. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya regulasi keluarga yang lebih kontekstual dan pluralistik sesuai nilai Pancasila.
References
Adi, Haryo Pradipta. Fenomena proses perkawinan lintas agama dan makna keluarga berbeda agama (studi kasus di masyarakat Suku Tengger di desa Tosari, kabupaten Pasuruan). UNS (Sebelas Maret University), 2019. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/78077/Fenomena-proses-perkawinan-lintas-agama-dan-makna-keluarga-berbeda-agama-studi-kasus-di-masyarakat-Suku-Tengger-di-desa-Tosari-kabupaten-Pasuruan.
Amiruddin, Amiruddin. ‘Nikah Beda Agama di Indonesia: Studi Komparasi Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Nasional’. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam 18, no. 1 (2024): 1. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v18i1.207.
Auda, Jasser. ‘A Maqaṣidī Approach to Contemporary Application of the Sharī ‘ah’. Intellectual Discourse 19, no. 2 (2011).
Auda, Jasser. Maqaṣid Al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2022.
Basid, Abdul, Lilik Nur Kholidah, Muhammad Fahmi Hidayatullah, Eka Kurnia Firmansyah, Ahmad Iwan Zunaih, and Reza Ahmad Zahid. ‘Interfaith Marriage Controversies in Semarang: An Analysis of Qur’anic Legal Exegesis’. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 12, no. 3 (2024): 762–77. -. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.812.
Bowen, John R. Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia: An Anthropology of Public Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615122.
Brigitta, Clara, and Gunawan Djajaputra. ‘Analisis Pelaksanaan Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan’. UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 4. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2028. ‘Dinamika Kehidupan Budaya Masyarakat Suku Tengger dalam Harmoni Lintas Agama | Pedagogy: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan’. Accessed 20 August 2025. https://ejournal.upm.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/1253?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Dintara Lubis, Syaddan. ‘Pernikahan Beda Agama Berdasarkan Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (Analisis Penetapan No. 42/Pdt.p/2014/PN.Unr)’. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 5, no. 1 (2023): 113–23. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v5i1.1685.
Efendi, Roni. ‘Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Paradigma Sosiological Jurisprudence’. Al Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2020): 49–56.
Effendi, Saekan Erniati. ‘Sejarah Penyusunan Kompilasi Hukum Islam’. Penerbit Arloka Surabaya, 1997.
F Nisa, Eva. ‘Interfaith Marriages in Indonesia: Between the Law, State Ideology, and Progressive Muslim Voices’. In Muslim Marriage and Non-Marriage: Where Religion and Politics Meet Intimate Life, edited by Julie McBrien and Annelies Moors. Islam, Culture and Society. Leuven University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5076197.16.
Fikriana, Askana, and Syahri Erpandi. ‘Koeksistensi Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia Interpretasi Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Pernikahan Beda Agama di Indonesia’. Dalihan Na Tolu: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Komunikasi Indonesia 2, no. 01 (2023): 53–59. https://jurnal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Jhui/article/view/283.
Garuda TV, dir. Presiden Prabowo: Saya Bukti Keluarga Pancasila. 2024. 02:47. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEwkcc1Hrug. HAM, Komnas, and ICRP. Pernikahan Beda Agama: Kesaksian, Argumen Keagamaan dan Analisis Kebijakan. Komnas HAM, 2005.
Hidayat, M. Taufiq, Ali Nu’man, Ashabul Yamin, Hafidh Hafidh, and Kasuwi Saiban. ‘Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Di Indonesia Tentang Pernikahan Beda Agama’. ARZUSIN 3, no. 1 (2023): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v3i1.822.
Hubungan Pluralisme terhadap Koeksistensi Masyarakat Adat Ngadas dalam Keberagaman Agama – Buletin Macapat. 7 January 2020. https://macapat.ub.ac.id/hubungan-pluralisme-terhadap-koeksistensi-masyarakat-adat-ngadas-dalam-keberagaman-agama/.
Joni Dwi Purwanto. ‘Analisis Pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif Dan Maqāṣid Syari’ah (Studi Komparatif Putusan Nomor.68/PUU-XII/2014 Dan Putusan Nomor.24/PUU-XX/2022)’. Other, IAIN Salatiga, 2024. http://e-repository.perpus.uinsalatiga.ac.id/20633/.
Kompilasi hukum Islam. Pustaka Widyatama, 2004.
‘Pengesahan Pernikahan Rizky Febian Dan Mahalini Ditolak Pengadilan Agama’. Accessed 29 December 2024.
ResearchGate. ‘Reforming Modernity: Ethics and the New Human in the Philosophy of Abdurrahman Taha, Written by Wael B. Hallaq’. Accessed 20 August 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345383418_Reforming_Modernity_Ethics_and_the_New_Human_in_the_Philosophy_of_Abdurrahman_Taha_written_by_Wael_B_Hallaq.
Ricklefs, Merle Calvin. Sejarah Indonesia Modern 1200–2008. Penerbit Serambi, 2008.
Shah, Dr Prakash, Prof Dr Mathias Rohe, and Professor Marie-Claire Foblets. Family, Religion and Law: Cultural Encounters in Europe. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2014.
Suhadi. ‘I Come from a Pancasila Family’: A Discursive Study on Muslim-Christian Identity Transformation in Indonesian Post-Reformasi Era. LIT Verlag Münster, 2014.
Suhartiningsih, Eka, Imanuddin Abil Fida, and Moh Lubsi Tuqo. ‘Makna Perkawinan Bagi Masyarakat Suku Tengger dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam’. USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 1 (2023): 121–41. https://jurnal.staim-probolinggo.ac.id/USRAH/article/view/666.
Turner, Victor W. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Transaction Publishers, 2011.
Wahyuni, Sri. ‘Legal Transplant: Influence of The Western Legal System in The Muslim Countries’. Justicia Islamica 19, no. 1 (2022): 21–37.
https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/justicia/article/view/2756.
Wahyuni, Sri. Nikah Beda Agama: Kenapa Ke Luar Negeri? Pustaka Alvabet, 2017.
Wahyuni, Sri. ‘Politik Hukum Perkawinan dan Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia’. Jurnal Pusaka 1, no. 2 (2014).
https://ejournal.alqolam.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_pusaka/article/view/7.
Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Univ of California Press, 1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Masrukhin Masrukhin, Lutfi Rahmatullah, Ahmad Suhendra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

