Religious Fanatic Subjects in the Postmodernism Era: the Meta-Theory of the Sociology of Religion Peter L. Berger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/belief.v1i1.6469Keywords:
Peter L. Berger, Religion, Fanaticism.Abstract
The tendency of every adherent of a religion or a sect of belief, it acknowledged or not, is fanaticism. It seems that there is not a single believer who will say that his religion is worse than any other religion. Every adherent of a religion will tend to defend their respective religions. Even if there is a difference, it only lies in the level of moderation; one is more open, while the other is more closed. In the book The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Berger seeks to understand how religious belief is shaped at the individual and social levels. Furthermore, he wants to say, of course, latently, that religion is like a shell or canopy, which makes its adherents feel safe but at the same time, it is difficult to see other values that exist outside the spectrum of values of the truth of their religion. The nature of the religious belief system creates perspective restrictions and ideological tendencies. Berger's thoughts on the sociology of religion are still relevant today, especially in the context of a pluralistic Indonesian society in the context of caring for diversity. This research method is qualitative, with literacy study techniques that refer to Berger's works, as well as through literacy studies of other relevant writings. The results of this research are expected to enrich theoretical studies for sociology scholars, especially those interested in the sociology of religion.
References
Adnan, Gunawan. 2021. Religion and the Challenges of Modernity in the Perspective of Peter L. Berger.
Berger, Peter L. 1990a. Social Interpretation of Reality: Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Berger, Peter L. 1990b. The Sacred Canopy: A Elements of A Sociological Theory of Religion.
Berger, Peter L. 1991. Rumors from the Sky: The Meaning of Theology in Modern Society. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Dharma, Ferr Adhi. 2023. “Construction of Social Reality: Peter L. Berger’s Thoughts About Social Reality.†Channel: Journal of Communication Studies: Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018, 1-9.
Fromm, Eric. 2011. Man Becomes God: The Struggle of the God of History and the God of Nature. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Hardiman, F. Budi. 2013. In the Snout of the Oligarchy: The Scandal of Democracy in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Lash, Scott. 1990. The Sociology of Postmodernism (A. Gunawan Admirantom, Translator). Kanisius: Yogyakarta.
Mawikere, Marde Christian. 2023. “Decomposing Berger and Luckmann’s Empirical Sociology as Knowledge Construction.†Https://Ejournal-Iakn-Manado.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Tumoutou/Article/View/840. Tumou Tou.
Mudzakir. 2014. “Islamic Law in Indonesia in the Perspective of Social Construction Peter L. Berger.†Al-’Ada 12(1).
Nurkhalis. 2023. “Peter l Berger’s Building Theory of Social Construction: A Surgical Theory of the Dual Reality of Human Life.†Community: Volume 4, Number 1, April 2018, 74-89. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
O’Dea, Thomas F. 1994. Sociology of Religion: An Initial Introduction (Team of Translation, Translator). Jakarta: PT. King of Grafindo Persada.
O’Donnell, Kevin. 2009. Postmodernism. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Raho, Bernard. 2003. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Jakarta: Obor.
Riza, Faisal. 2022. “The Social Construction of Veiled Women in the Qur’an House Aisyah Radhiyyallahu Anha, Deli Serdang Regency.†Al-Hadi Scientific Journal: Volume 8, Number 1, 2022, 52-63. https://ju.
Rohmawati, Yuyun. 2021. “Islam Gives Neo-Modernism/Post-Modernism.†Ushuluddin Science Journal Vol. 20, n.
Samuel, Hanneman. 2012. Peter Berger: A Brief Introduction. Depok: Ladybug.
Sen, Amartya. 2007. Violence and Illusions of Identity. Serpong: Left Margin.
Zain, Muhammad. 2005. “Initiating a New Religion in the Postmodernism Era.†Ulumuna Volume IX.