Decision-Making System for KIP IAIN Bukittinggi Scholarship Recipients Using the SAW and TOPSIS Methods

Authors

  • Uqwatul Alma Wizsa UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Yulifda Elin Yuspita UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Wikasanti Dwi Rahayu UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30983/ijokid.v2i1.5188

Keywords:

KIP Kuliah, SAW, TOPSIS

Abstract

The KIP scholarship is one of the scholarships available at IAIN Bukittinggi, and prospective recipients will be chosen based on the number of quotas available. Thus far, the selection process has been carried out by calculating the total value based on the sum of the percentages of each criterion arranged according to the level of importance. The procedure does not include a decision-making system for determining whether or not to accept the KIP scholarship. As a result, a decision support system is required to quickly and accurately determine which students are eligible for scholarships. In this research, the decision-making system compares the SAW and TOPSIS methods, with the latter using normalized weights in calculating the preference value as a determining value for alternative scholarship recipients to be selected. The SAW method was found to be more sensitive than the TOPSIS method in the data for the KIP scholarship 2020 recipients at IAIN Bukittinggi, with a sensitivity value of 96.87 compared to 81.96 for the TOPSIS method. Based on these findings, the SAW method can be recommended as a decision return system for KIP scholarship recipients to study at IAIN Bukittinggi the following year.

References

Rezeki, M., & Putra, N. (2021). Application of the Fuzzy Sugeno Method in a Decision Support System for Teacher Performance Assessment. Knowbase : International Journal of Knowledge in Database, 1(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.30983/ijokid.v1i2.5043

Yuspita, Y. E., Minova, P. N., & Ansara, A. D. P. (2022). Selection Of Internet Provider To Improve Quality Of Service And Learning Using Decision Support System. Jurnal Mantik, 6(1), 105–111.

Khasanah, F. N., & Rofiah, S. (2019). Sistem Seleksi Penerimaan Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Pendukung Keputusan Simple Additive Weighting. 8.

Fauzan, R., Indrasary, Y., & Muthia, N. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Bidik Misi di POLIBAN dengan Metode SAW Berbasis Web. Jurnal Online Informatika, 2(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v2i2.101

Wang, V. V., Sukamto, A. S., & Pratama, E. E. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Mahasiswa Penerima Beasiswa BBP-PPA dengan Metode TOPSIS pada Fakultas Teknik UNTAN. Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (JUSTIN), 7(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v7i2.29656

Sari, S. W., & Purba, B. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Ketua Danru Terbaik Menggunakan Metode ARAS. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS) SAINTEKS 2019.

Augusto, J. Y., Mulyawan, B., & Sutrisno, T. (n.d.). Perbandingan Metode Topsis Dan Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Rekomendasi Penentu Penerima Beasiswa SMA DY. 4.

Eniyati, S. (2011). Perancangan sistem pendukung pengambilan keputusan untuk penerimaan beasiswa dengan metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting). Dinamik, 16(2).

Setiadi, A., Yunita, Y., & Ningsih, A. R. (2018). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting(SAW) Untuk Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 7(2), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.572

Widianta, M. M. D., Rizaldi, T., Setyohadi, D. P. S., & Riskiawan, H. Y. (2018). Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW & PROMENTHEE) for Employee Placement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953, 012116. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012116

Sari, R. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Penerima Beasiswa Dengan Metode Topsis. Evolusi : Jurnal Sains dan Manajemen, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/evolusi.v6i2.4426

Muzakkir, I. (2017). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Keluarga Miskin Pada Desa Panca Karsa II. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 9(3), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v9i3.156.274-281

Sudipa, I. G. I., & Puspitayani, I. A. D. (2019). Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 3(2), 85. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijnse.v3i2.22229

Roestam, R. (2018). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan Guru Teladan Pada SMA Negeri 4 Sarolangun. 18.

Yusnaeni, W., & Ningsih, R. (2018). Uji Sensitifitas Metode TOPSIS, SAW dan WP untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Supplier. 7.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Wizsa, U. A., Yuspita, Y. E., & Rahayu, W. D. (2022). Decision-Making System for KIP IAIN Bukittinggi Scholarship Recipients Using the SAW and TOPSIS Methods. Knowbase : International Journal of Knowledge in Database, 2(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.30983/ijokid.v2i1.5188

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): June 2022

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Uqwatul Alma Wizsa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).