The Supremacy of Revelation over Reason: Al-Ghazali's Critique of Rationalist Philosophy in Tahafut Al-Falasifah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30983/itr.v2i2.8838Keywords:
Revelation, Reason, Tahafut al-Falasifah, Islamic Philosophy, Islamic TheologyAbstract
This study examines the implications of the supremacy of revelation over reason in the development of Islamic philosophical thought, with a specific focus on Al-Ghazali’s Tahafut al-Falasifah. It seeks to address three key questions: (1) How does Al-Ghazali conceptualize the relationship between reason and revelation in the acquisition of knowledge? (2) What socio-cultural, political, and intellectual factors influenced Al-Ghazali’s critique of rationalist philosophy and his prioritization of revelation? (3) What are the broader implications of his thought for the evolution of Islamic theology and philosophy after the publication of Tahafut al-Falasifah? Using a descriptive-analytical approach, this study explores Al-Ghazali’s arguments within the context of broader Islamic philosophical debates, emphasizing his assertion of revelation as the ultimate epistemological authority. The findings indicate that Al-Ghazali viewed divine revelation as the most reliable and authoritative foundation for knowledge, challenging the dominance of Peripatetic Islamic philosophy, which heavily relied on Greek rationalist traditions. His critique was shaped by the socio-political milieu of his time, marked by the increasing popularity of rationalist philosophy and its perceived threat to Sunni orthodoxy. The study concludes that Al-Ghazali’s prioritization of revelation resulted in a gradual decline in critical reasoning and fostered greater skepticism toward foreign ideas within Islamic intellectual traditions. These developments significantly shaped theological and philosophical trajectories in the post-Tahafut era, highlighting the enduring impact of Al-Ghazali’s thought on Islamic intellectual history.
References
Aini, Q. (2016). Dissecting the Tahāfut Al - Falāsifah as the Critism of Ghazali Against the Muslim ’ s Philosopy. 13, 1–29.
Al-Ghazali. (1964). Mi’raj al-Salikin. Al-Saqafah al-Islāmiyyah.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. bin M. (1981). Ihya Ulumiddin (p. 63). Dar al-Ma’rifah.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. bin M. (1997). Tahafut al-Falasifah. Dar al-Mashriq.
Amien, M. M. (1993). Kerangka Epistemologi Al-Ghazali. Jurnal Filsafat, 1(1), 11–19.
Asmaya, E. (2018). Hakikat Manusia dalam Tasawuf Al-Ghazali. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Komunikasi, 12(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v12i1.1377
Bagir, H. (2018). Epistemologi Tasawuf: Sebuah Pengantar. Mizan.
Boon, M., & Van Baalen, S. (2019). Epistemology for interdisciplinary research – shifting philosophical paradigms of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4
Dahan, A. A. (1991). Tasawuf Sunni dan Tasawuf Falsafi: Tinjauan Filosofis. Ulumul Qur’an, II, 28–32.
Ghazali, M. B. (2001). Epistemologi Al-Ghazali. Alqalam, 18(90–91), 174. https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v18i90-91.1469
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2019). Subjectivity in debate: Some reconstructed philosophical premises to advance its discussion in psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49(2), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12200
Gozali, M. (2017). Agama dan Filsafat Dalam Pemikiran Ibnu Sina. Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 1(2), 22–36.
Hanim, N. (2014). Pendidikan Akhlak: Komparasi Konsep Pendidikan Ibnu Miskawaih dan al-Ghazali. Ulumuna, 18(1).
Harapah, A. S. (2020). Epistemologi: Teori, Konsepdan Sumber-Sumber Ilmu dalam Tradisi Islam. Dakwatul Islam, 5(1).
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Method. Sage Publication, Inc.
Henry Corbin. (1993). History of Islamic Philosophy. Institue of Ismaili Studies.
Hidayatullah, S. (2006). Relasi Filsafat dan Agama (Perspektif Islam). Jurnal Filsafat, 16(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.31271
Hilal, S. (2012). Fiqih Dan Permasalahan Kontemporer. Fakultas Syrai’ah IAIN Raden Intan Lampung, 1–9.
Imam al-Ghazali. (1989). Minhaj al-Abidin. Dar Kutub al-Arabiyyah.
Ismail, A. I., & Uyuni, B. (2019). Ghazali’s Sufism and Its Influence in Indonesia. DINIKA : Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v4i1.1712
Jamhari. (2015). Al-Ghazali dan Oposisinya Terhadap FIlsafat. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama, 16(1), 108–119.
Kholmuminov, J., & Juraev, N. (2020). The place and role of the sufi and philosophical order of the naqshbandi in the process of developing intercultural relations of the Tajik and Uzbek peoples. European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, 7(2), 308–317.
Khun, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (4th ed.). Chicago University Press.
Kurniawan, A. F., Hasan, N., & Arifin, A. Z. (2019). Wali And Karama: A discourse and authority contestation in Al-Tarmasi’S Bughyat Al-Adhkiya’. Al-Jami’ah, 57(2), 287–328. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.572.287-328
M. Fathin Shafly Marzuki, Raina Wildan, S. R. (2023). Penelusuran Epistemologi Kekadiman Alam Dalam Tahafut Al-Falasifah Dan Tahafut Al-Tahafut. 3(2), 1–23.
Mahmud, A. (2019). Jejak Pemikiran Al-Ghazali Dan Ibnu Rusyd Dalam Perkembangan Teologi Islam. Sulesana, 13, 183–198.
Mas’udi. (2013). Menyingkap Hubungan agama Dan Filsafat: Merenda kesesatan Filsafat al-Ghazali, Merespons keterhubungan Filsafat dan Agama Ibnu Rusyd. Jurnal Penelitian, 7(2), 301–322.
Misbachul. (2019). Hubungan Dengan Keadaan, Sabar Berdasarkan Kuat Dan Lemahnya Seseorang, Sabar Berdasarkan Hukum, Dan Sabar Berdasarkan Kondisi Seseorang. Spiritualis, 5(2), 113–133.
Muhammad, nur. (2011). ISLAM DAN LOGIKA MENURUT PEMIKIRAN ABU HAMID AL-GHAZALI Muhammad Nur IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. Jurnal Al-Ulum, 11(3), 47–78.
Mukhlis, F. H. (2018). Pergumulan Kalam Dan Falsafah “Yang Tak Kunjung Usai”: Sebuah Bacaan Kritis Pemikiran Muhammad Abid Al-Jabiri. Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Keagamaan, 12(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v12i2.11
Muliati, M. (2016). Al-Ghazali Dan Kritiknya Terhadap Filosof. Aqidah-Ta : Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah, 2(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24252/aqidahta.v2i2.3436
Nasr, Seyyed, H. (2013). The Three Muslim Sages. In Caravan (Vol. 84).
Nasr, S. H. (2006a). Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to The Presents: Philosophy in The Land of Prophecy. State University of New York Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2006b). Tiga Mazhab Utama Filsafat Islam (Terj. Maimun Syamsuddin). IRCISoD.
Nasution, H. (2014). Filsafat dan Mistisisme dalam Islam: Filsafat Islam, Mistisisme, Tasawu. Bulan Bintang.
Ni’am, S. (2020). The debate of orthodox sufism and philosophical sufism The Study of Maqamat in the Siraj al-Talibin of Shaykh Ihsan Jampes. Al-Jami’ah, 58(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2020.581.1-34
Rahman, F., Nuraripah, P., & Layyinah, R. (2018). Preventing Islamic Radicalism Through Integrative Epistemology of Sadrian Philosophy. Analisis, 18(2).
Rohmana, J. A. (2021). Diskursus Tasawuf Nusantara Di Mekah : Respons Mukhtar ‘ Aṭārid Al- Bughūrī Terhadap Ajaran Martabat Tujuh the Discourse of Malay-Indonesian Sufism in Mecca : a Response of Mukhtār ‘ Aṭārid of Bogor Towards the Doctrine of Seven Grades. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan. https://doi.org/10.31291/jlk.v19i1.923
Seyyed Hossein Nasr. (2002). The Heart of Islam. HarperOne.
Soleh, A. K. (2014). Mencermati Sejarah Perkembangan Filsafat Islam. Tsaqafah, 10(1).
Tamrin, A. (2019). Relasi Ilmu, Filsafat dan Agama Dalam Dimensi Filsafat Ilmu. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 6(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v6i1.10490
Wahid, M. A. (2020). Teologi Muhammad Abduh. AL-FIKR Teologi Muhammad Abduh, 22(01), 71–84.
Yazdani, A. (2021). Al-Ghazālī’s View on Causal Necessity and the Theory of Divine Custom. Meta (Romania), 13(1), 121–137.
