Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Praktek pada Materi PAI Praktek Sholat Wajib


Authors :
(1) Rahmahidayati Sari Mail (IAIN Takengon, Indonesia)
(2) Ayu Rahma Nengsi Mail (IAIN Takengon, Indonesia)

Abstract


Abstract

The aim for this research was carried out to create a product in the form of an assessment sheet for the practice of obligatory prayers. Research regarding the assessment and implementation of obligatory prayers for students has been conducted previously. However, this research was conducted to create a product in the form of an assessment sheet for elementary school students' mandatory prayer practice. The formulation of the research problem is whether the resulting product assessment sheet is suitable for use? To answer these research questions, researchers used the research method carried out, namely development research using the ADDIE development model. The feasibility seen by researchers here is in terms of construct validity and practicality of the assessment sheet. To assess construct validity and practicality, researchers asked for advice and recommendations from experts. The product assessment sheet produced in the research was assessed by experts. There are several inputs and suggestions from these experts which are used as a basis for making improvements to the product assessment sheet. After making improvements according to suggestions and input from experts, this product assessment instrument was declared feasible in terms of construct and practicality.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini dilakukan menciptakan sebuah produk berupa lembar penilaian praktek sholat wajib. Penelitian pengembangan bahan ajar dan pelaksanaan sholat wajib bagi siswa telah pernah dilakukan oleh peneliti sebelumnya.  Namun penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menciptakan sebuah produk berupa lembar penilaian praktek sholat wajib siswa SD. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah apakah lembar penilaian produk yang dihasilkan telah layak untuk digunakan? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan penelitian tersebut, peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian pengembangan dengan menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE. Kelayakan yang dilihat oleh peneliti disini dari segi construct validity dan kepraktisan lembar penilaian. Untuk menilai construct validity dan kepraktisannya, peneliti meminta saran dan rekomendasi dari expert. Lembar penilaian produk yang dihasilkan pada penelitian dinilai oleh ahil/ expert. Ada beberapa masukan dan saran dari expert tersebut yang dijadikan sebagai dasar melakukan perbaikan pada lembar penilaian produk tersebut. Setelah melakukan perbaikan sesuai saran dan masukan dari expert maka instrument penilaian produk ini dinyatakan layak dari segi construct dan kepraktisannya.


Full Text:

PDF

| DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/surau.v1i2.7320

References

, P. 1 U. R. N. 20 T. (2003). Udang Udang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003. UU Sisdiknas, 1–21.

Abrahams, ian et all. (2013). the assessment of practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 209–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.858496

Agustien, R., Umamah, N., & Sumarno, S. (2018). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Video Animasi Dua Dimensi Situs Pekauman di Bondowoso Dengan Model Addie Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas X IPS. Jurnal Edukasi, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v5i1.8010

Arikunto, S. (2018). dasar dasar evaluasi pendidikan (R. Damayanti (ed.); 3rd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Azis, A., Zali, M., Indriani, F., & Lubis, M. (2023). Penerapan Metode Giving Question and Getting Answer untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.53802/fitrah.v4i1.379

Brookhart, S. M. et all. (2016). A Century of Grading Research: Meaning and Value in the Most Common Educational Measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069

Ernawati, I. (2017). Uji Kelayakan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Pada Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Server. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 2(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v2i2.17315

Hakim, L. (2012). Internalisasi Nilai-nilai Agama Islam dalam Pembentukan Sikap dan Perilaku Siswa Sekolah Dasar Islam Terpadu Al-Muttaqin Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 67–77.

Khoriyah, R., & Muhid, A. (2022). Inovasi Teknologi Pembelajaran dengan Menggunakan Aplikasi Wordwall Website pada Mata Pelajaran PAI di Masa Penerapan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Tinjauan Pustaka. Tarbiyah Wa Ta’lim: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.21093/twt.v9i3.4862

Kohn, A. (2006). Speaking My Mind: The Trouble with Rubrics. English Journal, 95(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.2307/30047080

Kumar, V. S., & Boulanger, D. (2021). Automated Essay Scoring and the Deep Learning Black Box: How Are Rubric Scores Determined? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(3), 538–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00211-5

M, B. T. & K. (1992). Process and structure in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Mertler, C. A. (1998). Classroom Assesment Practices of Ohio Teachers. The Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, 23.

Mertler, C. A. (2000). Article 25 Recommended Citation Recommended Citation Mertler. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(December), 25.

Moskal, B. M. (2001). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 2000–2001.

Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(14), 2002–2003.

Mufidah, N., & Maulida, M. Z. (2022). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Ibadah Amaliyah Melalui Kegiatan Praktik. MA’ALIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(02), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.21154/maalim.v3i2.4475

Muruganantham, G. (2015). Developing of E-content package by using ADDIE model. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(3), 52–54.

Nadiyah, R. S., & Faaizah, S. (2015). The Development of Online Project Based Collaborative Learning Using ADDIE Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1803–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.392

Nengsi, A. R., & Efrina, G. (2019). Optimalisasi Tes Prestasi Buatan Guru Mata Pelajaran Ips Sd Untuk Evaluasi Pembelajaran Yang Presisi. Ta’dib, 22(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v22i2.1498

Rusman, E., & Dirkx, K. (2017). Developing rubrics to assess complex (generic) skills in the classroom: How to distinguish skills’ mastery levels? Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 22(12), 1–9.

Sani, A. S. (2016). Penilaian Autentik (R. D. Aningtyas (ed.); 1st ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Sesmiarni, Z., Darmawati, G., Yuspita, Y. E., Yeri, S., & Ikhsan, I. (n.d.). Android-Based Augmented Reality: An Alternative in Mastering Tajweed for Student Learning.

Subagia, I. W., & Wiratma, I. G. L. (2016). Profil Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 5(1), 39–54.

Ursin, J., Huusko, M., Aittola, H., Kiviniemi, U., & Muhonen, R. (2008). Evaluation and quality assurance in Finnish and Italian Universities in the Bologna process. Quality in Higher Education, 14(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802278222

Widi, E., Saraswati, P., & Dayakisni, T. (2017). Kedisiplinan Siswa Siswi SMA Ditinjau dari Perilaku Wajib Lima Waktu. Jurnal Psikologi Islam, 4(2), 135–150.

Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/surau.v1i2.7320

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


_____________________________________________________________________
Academia.Edu

SURAU : Journal of Islamic Education
e-ISSN :
Organized by : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
W : https://ejournal.uinbukittinggi.ac.id/index.php/surau

E : surau.journal@uinbukittinggi@gmail.com
"View Stats"
Creative Commons License
Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License