The MECRI Nadiem Makarim’s “Freedom of Learning”: A Critical Study of John Dewey’s Pragmatic Philosophy


Authors :
(1) Yohannes Telaumbanua Mail (Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia)
(2) Yalmiadi Yalmiadi Mail (Universitas Dharma Andalas Padang, Padang, Indonesia)
(3) Titin Ritmi Mail (Politeknik Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia)

Abstract


“Freedom of Learning” is the MECRI Nadiem Makarim’s sensational policy. Its top goals are to provide students with freedom of thinking and urge teachers to shift their education paradigms from traditional to contemporary ones. However, the facts assume that such a policy is trumping up and secretly includes Indonesian education in a list of the secular capitalist-style curriculum. The facts seem biased and even counter-productive if they are left unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to diagnose the meaning of the policy in John Dewey’s pragmatic philosophy and its effects. This was qualitative research. Observation was a technique for collecting the data. Miles and Huberman’s model was a technique for analyzing the data. Credibility and dependability were used to examine the validity of the data. The results showed that the implied meaning of Makarim’s freedom of learning policy is interpreted as a process of building students’ reality through interaction with their real life. Knowledge is based on students’ experiences and constructed using scientific methods. The teacher’s role is to develop the students’ critical and creative thinking skills through scientific process. The curriculum prepares students for changes, research and verification, and problem-solving activities. More importantly, the policy urges to bring the classes closer to digital technology and e-devices, arouses students’ global awareness and learning skills of the 7C’s X 3C’s + 1I’s. In conclusion, the policy aims to advance the value and quality of education for Indonesian in the current era of digital technology.   

Merdeka Belajar” adalah kebijakan sensasional Mentri Pendidikan R.I. Nadiem Makarim yang tujuan utamanya adalah untuk memberikan mahasiswa kebebasan berpikir serta mendorong para guru untuk bisa merubah paradigma pendidikan mereka dari paradigma tradisional ke kontemporer. Namun, fakta berasumsi bahwa kebijakan semacam itu adalah sebuah rekayasa belaka dan secara diam-diam memasukkan pendidikan Indonesia ke dalam daftar kurikulum ala kapitalis sekuler. Fakta tersebut tampak bias dan bahkan kontra-produktif jika dibiarkan tidak dieksplorasi. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendiagnosis makna kebijakan dalam filsafat pragmatis John Dewey dan efek yang menyertainya. Ini adalah penelitian kualitatif. Observasi merupakan teknik pengumpulan data. Model Miles dan Huberman adalah teknik untuk menganalisis data. Kredibilitas dan ketergantungan digunakan untuk menguji validitas data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa makna tersirat dari kebijakan kebebasan belajar mentri Makarim dimaknai sebagai proses membangun realitas siswa melalui interaksi dengan kehidupan nyata mereka. Pengetahuan didasarkan pada pengalaman siswa dan dikonstruksi menggunakan metode ilmiah. Peran guru adalah mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif siswa melalui proses ilmiah. Kurikulum berfokus pada mempersiapkan siswa untuk perubahan, penelitian dan verifikasi, dan kegiatan pemecahan masalah. Lebih penting lagi, kebijakan tersebut mendesak untuk membawa mahasiswa lebih dekat dengan penguasaan teknologi digital dan perangkat elektronik, membangkitkan kesadaran global siswa dan keterampilan belajar 7C’s X 3C’s + 1I’s. Kesimpulannya, kebijakan tersebut bertujuan untuk memajukan nilai dan kualitas pendidikan bagi masyarakat Indonesia di era teknologi digital saat ini.


Keywords


freedom of learning, john dewey, pragmatic philosophy


| DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/mj.v2i1.5392

References

Book

Ansyar, M. (2015) Kurikulum: Hakikat, Fondasi, Desain, dan Pengembangan. Rawamangun. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Barnes, D. (1989) Active Learning. Leeds University TVEI Support Project.

Bonwell, C.; Eison, J. (1991) Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.

Hashemi, N. (2009) Secularism. The Oxford. Edited by John L. Esposito. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herrington, A. & Herrington, J. (2006) Authentic Learning Environments in Higher Education. Hershey, USA: Information Science Publishing.

Journal

Adeleye, J. O. (2017) ‘Pragmatism and its implications on teaching and learning in Nigerian schools’, Research Highlights in Education, pp. 2–6.

Al-Asfour, A. (2012) ‘“Online Teaching: Navigating Its Advantages, Disadvantages and Best Practices.”’, Tribal College Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 23(3).

Wood, D. F. (2003) ‘“ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning”’, BMJ, 326(7384), pp. 328–330.

Bean, J. C. (2011) Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking and Active Learning in the Classroom. 2ed edn. Florida: John Wiley & Sons. p. 384.

Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2014) ‘Authenticity’, ELT Journal, 68(4), pp. 457–459.

Johnson, H. M. (2007) ‘“Dialogue and the construction of knowledge in e-learning: Exploring students’’ perceptions of their learning while using Blackboard’s asynchronous discussion board.””’, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 10(1), pp. 75–96.

Yusuf, M. (2014) Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penenlitian Gabungan. 1st edn. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Zagranski, Richard, Whigham, T William, Dardenne, L, P. (2007) Understanding Standards-based Education: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Administrators. California: Corwin Press.

Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., Maier, U. H., & Staley, R. (2002) ‘From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning’, Journal of Experimental Education, 70(4), pp. 293–315.

Online References

Azzura, S. N. (2019) ‘“Pro Kontra Nadiem Makarim Jadi Menteri, Peningkatan Ekonomi Hingga Nasib Gojek,”’ https://www.merdeka.com. Available at: https://www.merdeka.com/uang/pro-kontra-nadiem-makarim-jadi-menteri-peningkatan-ekonomi-hingga-nasib-gojek.html.

Beck, R. H. (2009) The Three R’s Plus: What Today’s Schools are Trying to Do and Why. Minesota, USA: U of Minnesota Press.

Boss, S. (2011) Project-Based Learning: A Short History. Available at: https://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning-history.

Boyd, N. (2021) Pragmatism: Overview & Practical Teaching Examples. Available at: https://study.com/academy/lesson/pragmatism-overview-practical-teaching-examples.html.

Cohen, M., L. (2020) Philosophical Perspectives in Education Part 3. Available at: https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP3.html.

Dewey, J. (1948) Education and the Philosophic Mind. New York: MacMilian Co.

Drew, C. (2021) The 4 Principles of Pragmatism in Education. Available at: https://helpfulprofessor.com/pragmatism-in-education/.

Hantoro, J. (2019) ‘“Mendikbud Nadiem Makarim Hapus Ujian Nasional Mulai 2021”’. Available at: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1282545/mendikbud-nadiem-makarim-hapus-ujian-nasional-mulai-2021.

Hardiyan, Y. (2019) ‘Jokowi Lantik 38 Menteri Kabinet Indonesia Maju’, https://kabar24.bisnis.com/. Available at: https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20191023/15/1162368/jokowi-lantik-38-menteri-kabinet-indonesia-maju.

Harususilo, Y. E. (2019) ‘“4 Gebrakan Merdeka Belajar Mendikbud Nadiem, Termasuk Penghapusan UN!”’ Available at: https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/12/11/13091211/4-gebrakan-merdeka-belajar-mendikbud-nadiem-termasuk-penghapusan-un?page=all#page2.

Jannah, C. (2019) ‘“Merdeka Belajar: Kebijakan Lompat-lompat ala Nadiem Makarim”’.

John R. Shook (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Karakaş-Özür, N. and Duman, N. (2019) ‘The Trends in Authentic Learning Studies and the Role of Authentic Learning in Geography Education’, International Education Studies, 12(12), p. 28. doi: 10.5539/ies.v12n12p28.

Kennedy, R. (2019) Progressive Education: How Children Learn. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/progressive-education-how-children-learn-today-2774713.

Kriyantono, R. (2006) Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Prenada.

Kyriacou, C. (1992) ‘“Active Learning in Secondary School Mathematics”’, British Educational Research Journal, 18(3), pp. 309–318.

Lee, L., & Bullivant, S. (2016) ‘Secularism’. A Dictionary of Atheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leeuwen, F. (2016) Reflections on “Democracy and Education. Available at: https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/21385:reflections-on-democracy-and-education.

Loutchko, Iouri; Kurbel, Karl; Pakhomov, A. (2002) ‘Production and Delivery of Multimedia Courses for Internet Based Virtual Education; the World Congress’, (The World Congress "Networked Learning in a Global Environment: Challenges and Solutions for Virtual Education, Berlin, Germany, 1–4 May 2002).

Luke, W. G. (2016) The Nonreligious: Understanding Secular People and Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Markham, T. (2011) ‘Project Based Learning’, Teacher Librarian, 39(2), pp. 38–42.

McMillan, H. J. (2008) Assessment Essentials for Standards-Based Education. California: Corwin Press.

Mueller, J. (2016) Authentic Assessment Toolbox: How Do You Create Authentic Assessments? Available at: http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm.

Nita, C. N. (2019) ‘“Ujian Nasional Dihapus, Jumli: Ada Dampak Positif dan Negatifnya”’. Available at: https://bangka.tribunnews.com/2019/12/13/ujian-nasional-dihapus-jumli-ada-dampak-positif-dan-negatifnya.

Nitko, A. J. (2001) Educational Assessment of Students. 3rded edn. Upper saddle River, New Jersey.: Prentice Hall/Merrill Education Publication.

Ornstein, C, A., & Hunkins, P. H. (2013) “Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues”. 6th edn. New York: Pearson.

Sadulloh, U. (2008) Pengantar Filsafat Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Safi’i, M. F. (2019) ‘“4 Pokok Kebijakan ‘Merdeka Belajar’, Ini Penjelasan Mendikbud”’. Available at: https://hot.liputan6.com/read/4131904/4-pokok-kebijakan-merdeka-belajar-ini-penjelasan-mendikbud.

Salahudin (2011) Filsafat Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Sarah, S. (2018) ‘Pandangan Filsafat Pragmatis John Dewey dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan Fisika’, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika FITK UNSIQ, 1(1), pp. 67–77. Available at: https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/semnaspf/article/view/126.

Sharma, S. et al. (2018) ‘549 Pragmatism in Education’, 5(1), pp. 1549–1554. Available at: www.ijetsr.com.

Sugiyono (2007) Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tiffany, M. (no date) ‘Educational Portfolio: A Gardening Perspective’. Available at: http://misstiffanytucker.weebly.com/global-awareness.html.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/mj.v2i1.5392

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yohannes Telaumbanua, Yalmiadi, Titin Ritmi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Journal Indexed by: