Interspecies Kinship of Liuran: Rethinking Marshall Sahlins’s Mutuality of Being
Authors :
(1)
Sofiatul Hardiah 
(Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia)Abstract
The anthropological discussions regarding the concept of mutuality of being by Marshal Sahlins have focused on the idea that kinship only occurs between humans through certain rituals or traditions. This idea is limited in considering non-human species that also potentially form interspecies kinship. Through a multispecies ethnographic approach, this article discusses interspecies kinship in the context of joint agricultural care without exchanging exact amount of payment (liuran) by female farmers in Kampung Laut District, Cilacap Regency, Indonesia. In this study, the data were collected through participant observation techniques and in-depth interviews with four female farmers as key informants who have been involved in liuran for years. The findings showed that the interspecies kinship between female farmers and rice and garden crops is like mother and child because there has been an emotional-ecological bond in the process of caring for sedimentation farming over decades, primarily through taboo practices. The process of caring for rice and garden plants together also forms a socio-economic support system among female farmers, which helps strengthen their interspecies kinship. Considering non-human species as part of the family members places them in an equal relationship with humans in contributing to the sustainability of living ecosystems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF
| DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v7i2.7283
References
Chudakova, T. (2017). Plant matters: Buddhist medicine and economies of attention in postsocialist Siberia. American Ethnologist, 44(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12483
Descola, P. (2012). Beyond nature and culture. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2(1), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.020
Fuentes, A. (2020). Commentary: Other Animals as Kin and Persons Worthy of Increased Ethical Consideration. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180119000744
Haraway, D. J. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (vol. 1). Prickly Paradigm Press Chicago.
Haraway, D. J. (2013). When Species Meet (Vol. 3). University of Minnesota Press.
Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2021). From Polarisation to Multispecies Relationships: Re-Membering Narratives. In: McIntyre-Mills, J.J., Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (eds) From Polarisation to Multispecies Relationships. In Contemporary Systems Thinking (pp. 173–212). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6884-2_10
Meijer, E. (2019). Animal Languages: The Secret Conversations of the Living World. Hachette UK.
Mulyadi, S. (2013). Kisah Pergulatan Peradaban Suku Pejagan dalam Sejarah Ingatan Kampung Laut. Yayasan Sosial Bina Sejahtera.
Nagel, T. (2006). “What Is It like to Be a Bat?,.” Theories of Mind: An Introductory Reader.
Nathen, T. (2018). “Being attentive”: exploring other-than-human agency in medicinal plants through everyday Rastafari plant practices. Anthropology Southern Africa, 41(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2018.1468720
Robbins, J. (2013). On kinship and comparsion, intersubjectivity and mutuality of being. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.022
Romm, N. R. A., & Lethole, P. V. (2021). Prospects for Sustainable Living with Focus on Interrelatedness, Interdependence and Mutuality: Some African Perspectives (pp. 87–114). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6884-2_6
Sahlins, M. (2013). What Kinship Is-and Is Not. University of Chicago Press.
Sanjatmiko, P. (2016). Common Property di Tengah Perubahan Bentang Alam Kawasan Segara Anakan. Departemen Antropologi UI.
Sanjatmiko, P., & Hardiah, S. (2022). The tragedy of the open society and COVID-19 pandemic: local community resistance to neoliberal hegemony (A multispecies ethnography). Journal of Applied Communication Research, 50(5), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2022.2123250
Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An Inventory of Shimmers. In The Affect Theory Reader (pp. 1–26). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822393047-002
Serpell, J. (1996). In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-Animal Relationships. Cambridge University Press.
Shryock, A. (2013). It’s this, not that. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.016
Stasch, R. (2009). Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Univ of California Press.
van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., & Münster, U. (2016). Multispecies Studies: Cultivating Arts of Attentiveness. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695
Interview
Ani. Interview with Female farmer, January 26, 2019
Warni. Interview with Female farmer, January 19, 2019
Wati. Interview with Female farmer, January 20, 2019
Yana. Interview with Female farmer, January 21, 2019
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v7i2.7283
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sofiatul Hardiah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
______________________________________________
 | Jurnal Fuaduna: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan |
